Submitted by MyCouchPullsOat t3_11858b6 in worldnews
TheDevilChicken t1_j9g9dq8 wrote
Reply to comment by knotacylon in Putin Halts Nuke Pact With US, Vows to Push War in Ukraine by MyCouchPullsOat
The material in the nukes has a half-life, if that degrades too much then you can't have a proper nuclear explosion.
So nukes have literal timers and best-by dates if left as is.
So at best, if Russia did no maintenance, they have dirty bombs instead of proper nukes.
Can someone say if they can actually inspect that part of the nukes?
ATLien325 t1_j9gaalw wrote
If I’m not mistaking a dirty bomb is a conventional explosive with nuclear material attached. I don’t think there’s any convential explosives in nuclear bombs though.
edit - Nevermind I see what you’re saying
batmansthebomb t1_j9i7yoc wrote
There's definitely conventional explosives in a nuclear weapon, that's how they get the core to super criticality to begin the nuclear reaction.
ATLien325 t1_j9jhf7j wrote
Oh, didn’t realize. Always assumed it was electrical or something.
knotacylon t1_j9gfgir wrote
If I recall correctly you have to remove the core, and you essentially have to refine it again, removing all the decay products, and then you have to reshape it because the geometry of the core is super critical, and then you put it back in.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments