Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

Dull-Yard-3002 t1_ja76g5r wrote

I think it's about being cost effective. Artillery and long range missiles will be much more useful. Politics may play a part aswell, as it is easier get a bill passed through congress that don't include 60 million dollar jets.

21

slashd t1_ja783g3 wrote

What are the F16s going to do what the HIMARS, GLSDB and Storm Shadow cant? They already have the capability to hit Mariupol and thats enough.

3

oripash t1_ja7b58e wrote

Most likely. America would put a certain amount of vouchers or loans on the table, and anything Ukraine says they want comes at an opportunity cost of something else that means they cannot have. F-16’s would be an expensive item on the menu and would mean a bunch of other things they then can’t have (and may more desperately need).

11

MrDowntempo t1_ja7twuk wrote

Can Ukraine just buy them from General Dynamics Lockheed? Then countries could just donate the cost? Probably not, but I don't at all understand how the purchasing of jet fighters works.

4

Ivanduh69420 t1_ja83gq8 wrote

“Guys guys don’t worry we won’t be giving fighter jets to Ukraine,for nowstares into Russia’s soul

2

CantaloupeUpstairs62 t1_ja84nq6 wrote

Not without US government approval.

There are many MiGs available across Eastern Europe. Ukrainian pilots already know how to fly these, and Poland knows how to install NATO weapons on them.

MiGs could help Ukraine very soon, while F-16'S might not help this year. Maybe there can be a deal similar to Abraham's tanks, where the US agrees to send a few, so that other countries feel more comfortable sending other fighter jets.

12

2kids2adults t1_jaak4z4 wrote

Also, I’m sure there is a jet fuel problem. Ukraine gets jets that they may or may not be able to utilize in the long run. 🤷🏼‍♂️

1