Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Ooops2278 t1_ja4uix0 wrote

And coming from anybody else that would be a fair warning.

But Nancy Faeser -as it seems to be a basic qualification for that job- is a total and utter nutjob only looking at another topic to exploit as a "totally legit" reason to implement wide-spread surveilance of people's online activities.

16

xSilverMC t1_ja52lpm wrote

Remember two things:

  1. Surveillance is only bad if it's foreign

  2. If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear

^(this comment is brought to you by nancy fucking faeser herself)

13

666satanhimself t1_ja54y1n wrote

you kid, but my life could have turned out very differently had i not had my privacy violated. there are scenarios. one day we will learn lessons in duality

2

afoam t1_ja62cby wrote

> but my life could have turned out very differently had i not had my privacy violated

Have you switched topics or what are you alluding to here?

1