anti-DHMO-activist t1_ja9rkgv wrote
Reply to comment by Coolegespam in As Tokyo Electric Power Co. moves closer to discharging tons of stored water from its stricken Fukushima No. 1 nuclear plant, local opposition has intensified and cries of betrayal are being heard by DoremusJessup
Dosis sola facit venenum.
Do you have any education about radiation hazards and how to interpret them? You're acting like an expert yet failing to respond to the points at all.
You're arguing dishonestly and cherrypicking a tiny part instead of responding to the actual point - the total radiation dose. Do you know that you have quite a lot of radioactive potassium in your body? Tiny amounts are completely negligible and their effect is included in the radiation dose calculations. That's why I posted them. The target release level is below the food safety maximums set by the WHO, even if you drank the released water without further dilution.
Even in the worst case the effect is miniscule. Ffs, learn a thing about radiation and the units used to determine exposition.
>The latest committed effective dose coefficient of tritium incorporated into the body via the oral route in adults is 1.9 × 10−8 mSv/Bq for the soluble form, and that of the biogenic form is 5.1 × 10−8 mSv/Bq
this is already that worst case. And it's as minor as it gets. Do you think everybody knowing anything about radiation at all is an utter moron?
I'm sick of people who don't know anything trying to act educated but failing to grasp the most basic things.
And, again - this discharge is already being done and confirmed harmless.
Respond to my individual points please and stop the cherrypicking. It's obvious and dishonest.
Coolegespam t1_jabyi34 wrote
>Dosis sola facit venenum.
In radiation all dosage is cumulative and no, research has not shown otherwise yet.
>Do you have any education about radiation hazards and how to interpret them? You're acting like an expert yet failing to respond to the points at all.
I have a minor in Nuclear engineering and a minor in physics. So, kind of? I also have a BS in computational mathematics and poly sci, but they're less relevant.
>You're arguing dishonestly and cherrypicking a tiny part instead of responding to the actual point
Lol, you literally said this: >>Tritium occurs naturally, just saying. There's always a tiny amount in your drinking water. It's such a weak beta-emitter, that there's almost no danger from it.
and this
>> ...tritium decay is also far lower energy (and therefore both less penetrating and less damaging) than most other nuclear decay, to the point where it can't even penetrate human skin in the first place.
Really, this is the only point I've been attacking. Tritium is not a safe material, you keep saying it's harmless, and it's not. You don't know how it effects biological systems or the risk of it once ingested or inhaled. Your own paper says, exactly, what I said. Yet, somehow I'm dishonest.
>I'm sick of people who don't know anything trying to act educated but failing to grasp the most basic things.
Same.
>Respond to my individual points please and stop the cherrypicking. It's obvious and dishonest.
I did, you responded by posting a source that agreed with me, and point blank, said your understanding of the bio availability and effects of Tritium were wrong. Again, that is the only point I've been making this whole time.
doctoreldritch t1_jad3vf3 wrote
Dang you guys are really still going at this huh? Just so we're all on the same page, you are aware that we eat bananas, right?
As before, even just compared to normal potassium ingestion alone (nevermind commercial air flight or medical x-rays), this is nothing, both in volume and in energy level. Our bodies' normal repair mechanisms can shrug off this small amount of low-energy radiation without breaking stride. This is like ducks panicking about a light rain; you literally live constantly immersed in the stuff, this is not making any kind of difference whatsoever.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments