Submitted by DCmetrosexual1 t3_10lumvq in washingtondc
Gumburcules t1_j5zjifg wrote
Reply to comment by ertri in Opinion | D.C. is turning its beautiful streets into bar-code lookalikes by DCmetrosexual1
My proposal is to replace them with severe tire damage strips.
giscard78 t1_j5zlc9y wrote
my proposal is sharks with laser beams
(no, but seriously, the pylons should be strengthened)
ThatGuy798 t1_j5zx2pq wrote
So you're saying we must construct additional pylons?
freshOJ t1_j604f0f wrote
For Aiur!
burrito-disciple t1_j60qzni wrote
Then you'd just have a disabled vehicle stuck there
Gumburcules t1_j60tu2h wrote
Well yeah, otherwise they'd get away before the tow truck comes to take the car to the impound and crush it into a cube in front of the driver.
GrilledCyan t1_j6114qo wrote
You have thirty minutes to move your car…you have ten minutes…your car has been impounded…you car has been crushed into a cube…you have thirty minutes to move your cube!
burrito-disciple t1_j60u1n5 wrote
yikes
Gumburcules t1_j60ul9r wrote
You're right, too lenient.
We should leave the driver in the cube.
burrito-disciple t1_j60vb6h wrote
Is everything okay at home?
[deleted] t1_j61wnhz wrote
[deleted]
hemlockone t1_j65dabi wrote
A car was disabled taking the curve too sharp across the street from me. I live at a 4-way stop where three of the corners have a bio-retention curb extension (https://www.dcwater.com/whats-going-on/blog/working-together-build-sustainable-community #2). When a taxi ran aground, I made sure everyone was physically OK, then walked away because I wasn't particularly sympathetic. If the driver couldn't miss a giant concrete ditch and curb, what's to stop them from missing a child or a person?
ertri t1_j64gfki wrote
Sounds like a problem for the driver, not me
burrito-disciple t1_j64j9wz wrote
Lol y'all are so fussy
ertri t1_j650vtq wrote
Fussy? I literally don’t care what happens to the vehicle. How’s that being fussy?
burrito-disciple t1_j654xsf wrote
"I'm so fussy about something I don't like that I actively want other people to suffer for it" - u/ertri
ertri t1_j65anp8 wrote
Oh yeah, I don’t want drivers in bike lanes. I am fussy about that. I like people to actively suffer if they want to do shit that actively endangers me!
burrito-disciple t1_j65gsbj wrote
It's such an American thing to seek maximalist violent retribution for any perceived slight, whether real or imagined. Smh.
ertri t1_j661pby wrote
A bollard is stationary! Whatever’s behind it would get maximalist damage from a car going through it like what happens with plastic sticks!
I just think there should be consequences for maneuvering a multi thousand point piece of metal dangerously!
burrito-disciple t1_j662m1p wrote
>I like people to actively suffer
There's a difference between just consequences and sadistic retribution.
ertri t1_j66hlty wrote
Running into a bollard should have consequences because hitting a person behind that bollard sure as shit does!
Should people actively suffer because an idiot in a giant death machine was operating it poorly, or should the operator deal with the consequences?
burrito-disciple t1_j66ijm5 wrote
Just very cringey to invent situations where someone gets hurt or has to suffer and then to get excited about that thought.
Americans have a sick obsession with Retribution.
ertri t1_j68bm15 wrote
What? People literally drive over flex posts constantly, including right into bike lanes that other people are in. That’s not a made up situation, it happens every day on any of the protected lanes the original article is bitching about!
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments