Submitted by vje04519 t3_10djgao in washingtondc
FoggyBottomBreakdown t1_j4meomp wrote
Reply to comment by NPRjunkieDC in Purchasing my first home (condo in DC) and could use recommendations by vje04519
>My only advice is to buy in a building built before 1945. In DC, that means before 1920.
What’s the difference in years account for here?
NPRjunkieDC t1_j4mhgyo wrote
Construction is a race to the bottom that has accelerated even quicker in the last 20 years .
Cheaper materials, bad workmanship, and greed are the worst ingredients for a building, and that is happening in DC .
Also, the best locations were taken a hundred years ago. So if you want to live centrally located, these buildings are the best . On 16th, in Kalorama/AdMo, in Logan Circle, etc.
The spaces are larger , windows stronger, more natural light , hardwood floors, etc.
New buildings shine like Legotown near Union Market. Doorman, gym, whatever but no bones .
FoggyBottomBreakdown t1_j4mqjk1 wrote
This makes sense, older construction over new, but curious as to why you call out pre-1945 and then say “in DC that means before 1920.” Is pre-1945 a good benchmark for some locations but not in DC for some reason?
NPRjunkieDC t1_j4mrub5 wrote
After 1945, they invested the drywall + synthetic insulation . Windows nowadays have a 25-year warranty vs. 100+
Drywall is great if you need to knock out a wall.
The busiest bus route in DC is 16th St. I lived steps from the bus stop, and we couldn't hear the buses stopping and going every 2-3 mins. A few times with total silence, I heard "the fare is one dollar and...".
The stone walls were so thick on the facade and great windows, so heating and cooling was easier.
In some cities even 1960-1970 ok but most old developments in DC is pre-1920
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments