Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

carlyslayjedsen OP t1_j6p1mjj wrote

Reply to comment by monstermashedstrwbry in Man on green/yellow line sexually harassment by carlyslayjedsen

I get it; it’s just that if these people actually saw it in person they would understand. You can see EVERYTHING. I’m talking outlines of veins and glans. Flexing and moving it around. Imagine a hard dick covered in tight Lycra and nothing else. Graphic I know but he is clearly an exhibitionist. Technically always clothed which is a clear attempt at plausible deniability… clearly effective for some people in this thread.

121

c0dyb t1_j6p2pct wrote

id suggest you take a video of it next time, post to insta and twitter and tag all the metro socials

42

carlyslayjedsen OP t1_j6p2vil wrote

I’ve thought about that but I’m worried it would be like taking and posting a video of someone naked without their consent. Not sure where the line is drawn

17

CriticalMembership31 t1_j6p55tw wrote

If they’re in public you don’t need their consent. The camera can go wherever the public eye can go

86

scotch_please t1_j6pcq8p wrote

washingtonianprobs on Instagram would probably be happy to post it for you.

46

c0dyb t1_j6p35wh wrote

send me the video ill post it idgf, if i had a daughter i wouldnt want her to be subjected to that on the metro ( or a child of any gender for that matter)

37

IcyWillow1193 t1_j6p3o5j wrote

Some would argue that on most men, leggings are a crime. But beyond that I'd say trying to get a guy in trouble for having a boner while fully clothed is going to be an uphill battle.

−13

Tom-Ado t1_j6p700l wrote

Maybe, but you’re losing fidelity by leaving out the part where he gets close to people and poses in such a way that seeing it is unavoidable. That’s distinct from him just picking a seat and chilling there. In a workplace scenario this assuredly would be sexual harassment.

34