Quick-kick95 t1_j2ad5aj wrote
Reply to comment by Barnst in ABC News: "Washington, DC, records back-to-back years with 200 murders for 1st time in nearly 20 years" by Swampoodle1984
There are certain use of force reforms that have been more of a detriment than a help. Also I think a lack of officers and a willingness to work is a big issue.
fullstackbuffoon t1_j2adv15 wrote
Use of force restraints do nothing to prevent murders, except murders of citizens by police. For use of force restraints to have any impact on the murder rate would require officers to routinely interrupt murders in progress, showing up after the fact is a deterrent to nothing. Gtfoh.
Quick-kick95 t1_j2arwrz wrote
Alright well I think going through my history you can see my experience with this. And I'll give my public two cents, without speaking for anyone or anything.
The use of force changes caused a dip in interactions. The use of force shift also changed a lot of other things, chase policy, warrant levels, interactions, lack of stops, lack of contacts etc. Which would normally result in arrests, interdictions, intelligence, interactions in general- stopping, slowing down, or ceasing entirely.
The chokehold ban is a bit of a stretch- but anyone who is trained to fight recognizes that a neck restraint is a very effective method of controlling a subject. But more importantly the actual impact that these reforms had were an observable exodus. This exodus and mass quitting is pretty observable across a lot of first responder communities, from EMTs to cops. A lot of people didn't want to keep up with the work and the treatment they received.
A lot of law enforcement also experienced a brain drain. A lot of knowledge about proper procedure and methods of interdicting criminals left when these people left, or they altogether stopped doing it. Replacement of these people with ten, fifteen years experience in certain fields (narcotics interdiction, firearms recovery etc) is pretty dang hard to get.
In MPD's case, especially, the busier part, patrol (people that drive around and answer 911 calls) is a very understaffed and overworked area that burns people out pretty quickly. Especially in the southern areas of the city, where someone as young as 23-26 can see multiple murders and shootings and other awful things in the span of a few weeks.
This puts a tremendous mental toll on people, and cops are naturally going to be more resilient people after a while but eventually it is going to wear them down. So most people leave for greener pastures in a better department in the area or further away, and thus the cycle continues.
It is not going to get better if they implement similar things continually. Murders will continue to go up, shootings and carjackings will continue if the city keeps up their current trend. And keep in mind MPD's role is a part of the system, I'd place just as much blame on the court system and the release of violent offenders as a recurring issue.
I hope that helps in a more concise and longer answer of why I think things are the way they are.
Barnst t1_j2azm58 wrote
So I see where you’re coming from and generally am on board with what you’re saying. I’m a little skeptical that chases, stops, and warrant servicing are the best interactions for developing the sorts of relationships that get you good intelligence, but that’d be a better discussion to have over beers if the opportunity ever presented itself.
The problem with the union response is that this sort of knee-jerk excuse to justify a return to the MOST divisive police practices makes it really hard for those of us who want to reform policing with a sympathetic ear toward the actual experience of those policing.
Sure, a chokehold can be a really good way to restrain someone. But it’s also a really good way to inadvertently kill people and generally a bad way to rebuild relations with a community that fundamentally doesn’t trust you. Of ALL the tools you would want as a cop, that seems like a really bad hill to die on. You could also argue that a spiked club is a probably a pretty useful tool for subduing people, but we’re not about to let the cops walk around with them.
The unions here are doing the line duty cop no favors. It’s hard to convince people to have sympathy for the genuinely tough spot many cops find themselves in when all the public sees is stuff like this. It’d be easier if we ever saw ANY sense of real self-awareness and desire to improve from within the policing world rather than the knee-jerk defensiveness and refusal to accept any responsibility.
LoganSquire t1_j2c8q1n wrote
> The use of force changes caused a dip in interactions.
“If I can’t choke out a minority, I’m not going to do my job anymore”.
Imagine saying this with a straight face as a justification for poor performance.
NoDesinformatziya t1_j2cjf0n wrote
I don't have to imagine it. Dipshit cops who are bad at their jobs say it every day; good cops don't.
Quick-kick95 t1_j2ej78m wrote
I think you're misconstruing what I'm saying. I think I laid out what I thought and my experiences with it pretty well, and I think you're not coming from a good place to have a discussion for me to really go on with this. I hope you enjoy your holiday and stay safe.
BSDC t1_j2agj52 wrote
citation please
damnatio_memoriae t1_j2aqz37 wrote
it's not like all these murders are happening while the police are standing around helplessly wishing they were allowed to choke the perpetrator out.
Astrosimi t1_j2akrzf wrote
Like?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments