Submitted by pizza_4_all_ t3_zkzdt3 in washingtondc
SandBoxJohn t1_j04mk9r wrote
Reply to comment by pizzajona in Are most people in Washington DC liking the new Metro connection out to Dulles Airport? by pizza_4_all_
WMATA lowered maximum speeds long before what is stated in that Washington Post article. Rolling stock performance profiles were detuned back in the mid 1990s (reducing acceleration, deceleration rates and top speed) when stress cracks were found in the 1k car bodies and to prevent them from forming in the nearly identical 2,3 and 4k car bodies.
pizzajona t1_j04nap2 wrote
So what was the top speed before 2016?
SandBoxJohn t1_j04ptal wrote
Typically below 65 MPH as it took longer to accelerate to the higher speeds before needing to decelerate into the next station.
aDCperson123 t1_j04qizd wrote
Given the steel construction of the 7/8ks once they retire the Al cars would they maybe consider retuning?
SandBoxJohn t1_j04vtca wrote
It will likely not happen as running the trains like scalded dogs will shorten their service life in much the same way as what happened to the 1 and 4k cars.
aDCperson123 t1_j053y5s wrote
I just figured the fatigue properties of the alloy might be enough different to handle the stress. At some design limit of course it would be. It totally depends on the metallurgy and sizing.
yunnifymonte t1_j04z3eg wrote
Shorten their Service Life? I’m confused, I agree about the 4000 Series, but about the 1000 Series, weren’t Metro supposed to retire them earlier, but couldn’t due to a Railcar Shortage, Pre-7ks?
SandBoxJohn t1_j06d8po wrote
The 1k cars were designed for a service life of roughly 40 years. They began developing stress cracks in their car bodies at roughly half the length of their service life. They were for all practical purposes beyond the end of their service life before reaching 40 years.
yunnifymonte t1_j06kvgq wrote
Interesting.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments