Submitted by ekkidee t3_z2c5ma in washingtondc
SeaCommercial1996 t1_ixg25ty wrote
Damned if you do. Damned if you don’t.
DrunkWoodchuck t1_ixha1ih wrote
Not at all. It’s only damned if you refuse to adopt well-known and successfully implemented accessibility strategies in your infrastructure.
> This is not a choice between accessibility and bicycle lanes. These disability barriers are not necessary; rather, they result from the District’s systemic failure to adopt available, well- known, accessible designs for on-street parking and curb access—including practical solutions for bicycle lanes.
DC could have used an accessible bike lane design, they just chose not to.
SeaCommercial1996 t1_ixhew9i wrote
Curb side bike lanes are safer for bikes. Curb side parking is more accessible and safer for those who need it.
someone gets the shaft either way. It’s a lose lose situation.
[deleted] t1_ixi7hpy wrote
[deleted]
DrunkWoodchuck t1_ixj77yx wrote
Nobody gets the shaft with sidewalk-level bike lanes, which is what DC should have done from the start.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments