Submitted by [deleted] t3_12553zk in washingtondc
[deleted]
Submitted by [deleted] t3_12553zk in washingtondc
[deleted]
Most men have two arms so not sure how that’s gonna narrow things down.
We can rule out the guy who murdered Richard Kimble’s wife
How are you hearing about them?
Do we know anything about the suspects appearance if we know who they are targeting?
[deleted]
[removed]
It's very odd because this came out of no where.
I've lived in the Eliot on 4th for 2 years now. Never had any emails about crime and we got two in the last two days. Someone got carjacked outside the building and last night two dudes attacked the concierge.
Interesting
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
Then go talk to your neighbor….
[removed]
Well now we know why they don’t talk to their neighbors.
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[deleted]
[removed]
[deleted]
[removed]
Your fine to prove an adequate description of criminals, especially if it is coming from an official source (I.e. MPD). Even better, you could reference or cite where you have gotten your description from. What you shouldn’t do, is provide vague references to the criminals features. Why? If you provide ambiguous statements like “you guess the race” it can leave others to assume things about your intention/message.
As an example of what one could assume about your ambiguous statement earlier of the criminal: Did you intend to say, you can just assume it was a person of color? If so, obviously that’s a prejudge thing to do.
Upshot: Clear. Concise. And credibly cited criminal profiles are not a problem.
panther254 t1_je33en8 wrote
Dude you gotta learn how to comment correctly…