ShimbyHimbo t1_jaabnad wrote
Reply to comment by Fert1eTurt1e in D.C. Tenants in Rent-Controlled Units Could See as Much as 8.9 Percent Increases by rennbrig
The data is very mixed on that, no conclusive study has shown that rent control on its own reduces housing starts. Not to mention that multifamily properties are rarely held from construction through the period when rent control schemes kick in (typically no sooner than 15 years). In fact, standard property development pro formas typically factor for a sale of the property at year 15. Not to mention that while rent control does increase the tenure of tenants (which is a good thing!), very few rent control schemes actually have vacancy control, meaning that when the units do change over, the units can reset to whatever price the landlord deems reasonable. Many rent control schemes even provide allowances for landlords to make upgrades and increase rent accordingly.
At best, "rent control" in the US can at best be called stabilization, and often allow for above market increases. For example, under California's rent stabilization policies, which allows for up to a 10% increase per year, rent stabilized tenants sometimes receive a higher increase in rent than comparable non-stabilized units.
ShimbyHimbo t1_jaapne3 wrote
For those down voting me, if you're going to do that then you could at least tell me where I'm wrong. And don't bother citing the long debunked Berkeley studies.
ShimbyHimbo t1_jaat2di wrote
Here's a study to backup my assertions:
https://www.cura.umn.edu/research/minneapolis-rent-stabilization-study
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments