Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

glopmod t1_j9hu2lq wrote

Reply to comment by dynospectrum7 in Two-thirds of McPherson Square homeless remain on street, D.C. says by SnortingCoffee

"I'm trying to be respectful but I am going to dig through your shit to find a way to insult you." Gimme a fucking break.

​

There is a difference between denying a service that is directly offering to you and being counted as "not taking" something you were unaware of or not offered specifically; these programs are often seen as being not utilized by those who need them while in reality getting them, or having them offered at all, is more difficult or unlikely than you imply, and the numbers are offered publicly to appear as if people simply refuse. I am sorry you can't grasp that difference and believe the city's statement without question.

−1

dynospectrum7 t1_j9hwiju wrote

Oh god. Your emotions are yours to deal with. I’ll give you some stats. Half of the 55~ in the camp were not surveyed. It was because they weren’t able to be found, or declined to even go through the process.

You mean to tell me that these people have been trying to get housing for the several months they set up shop in the square?

And no, I didn’t have to dig through your posts. I just remember how ridiculous it was when I saw it.

7

glopmod t1_j9hx4md wrote

So... you understand that's not denied, right? Half aren't even counted in this data.

I don't know how you can smugly "give me some stats" and not understand they oppose your entire point.

​

I think that's enough time for your man. You should take the time you would give to being smug to a stranger to think about what little information you have and how it counters your own position.

2

dynospectrum7 t1_j9i2pqe wrote

What. Half of those offered housing denied it. What is so hard to understand here?

As someone that works with this population, my position is the same.

When it comes to these camps, the only way to get these people off their ass is to force them to take action. A camp shouldn’t be around indefinitely because people won’t take it seriously. Same with the eviction moratorium and people just saying fuck it when it comes to paying their rent. And if you don’t have experience in the matter, I’m not trying to hear it.

3

glopmod t1_j9i32dn wrote

Half of those there were not reached. That means a quarter denied it. What is so hard to understand here?

0

dynospectrum7 t1_j9i51ui wrote

Lmao. I’m going to assume you are a middle school aged person or are something else. They weren’t reached because they didn’t want to be reached. Many declined the survey. How the fuck you live in the park but somehow miss canvassing for two weeks.

Layman’s (your) terms.

If, over the course of two weeks, someone is taking a an assessment of the clothes washing ability of the people who live in your home, and even though the three other occupants actually wash clothes, yet you refuse to wash clothes, can they give you a score? Or were you simply not reached?

3

glopmod t1_j9i5kqo wrote

"They weren't reached because (makes something up with no information)"

Keep the insults to yourself. I apologize for suggesting you might not have all the answers. Obviously whatever you have decided is correct is.

1

dynospectrum7 t1_j9i6gdc wrote

Haaaaa. Well let’s get to it. I work with this population on the daily. Do you?

3

dynospectrum7 t1_j9i5jd3 wrote

And while we’re at it. Why the f are peoples denying housing?

2