Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

gucciflipflops337 t1_j25z59e wrote

Reply to comment by robbinhood69 in Progressive: The Valuation Enigma by 2ndSifter

Why type so many words just to say “I’m a fucking idiot and don’t have any idea what I’m talking about”.

3

0dteSPYFDs t1_j2626la wrote

Right? Why even try to argue when you clearly have zero understanding of complex financial concepts. It’s fucking complicated, but not black magic, with a sprinkle of fraud mixed in. I don’t expect anyone, except for specific niches of industry professionals to understand the inner workings of it.

2

robbinhood69 t1_j261lui wrote

why not attack hte substance of hwat i'm saying brody

−2

gucciflipflops337 t1_j261qsf wrote

Because there is no substance to what you’re saying. You’re saying something is a scam when you have no idea what it actually is. Despite someone trying to explain it to you

3

robbinhood69 t1_j2629kq wrote

what good reason is there to wrap instruments in an instrument called a synthetic GIC ?

Even homeboy said "oh they are required to hold fixed income and that's why they put it in GIC" but GIC is not just fixed income shit

it's a way for them to get around legislation so that it's technically "fixed income" but it's backed by shit that is not fixed income

0

gucciflipflops337 t1_j262twh wrote

Clearly you cannot comprehend the explanation that has been given to you. You’re dead set on it being a “scam” or some type of scheme.

Go look up the definition for dunning Kruger and you’ll find your answer

4