Submitted by 3week_old_cheese t3_z8m1n5 in wallstreetbets
[removed]
Submitted by 3week_old_cheese t3_z8m1n5 in wallstreetbets
[removed]
Your right I was forgetting about transaction costs but is it possible to avoid transaction costs
>but is it possible to avoid transaction costs
With crime, maybe
Classic infinite money hack. Don’t let the SEC find you.
>That is a very interesting idea. If you short a stock and then go long on the same stock, you will effectively cancel out your position and neither lose nor gain anything.
[removed]
Nah I mean at the same time with one slightly larger than the other so you either make a small profit or lose nothing
Wouldn't the above be exactly the same as just buying one share? Transaction cost aside
Just buy an ATM put and call on SPY when it's sitting at VWAP, go about a week or two out and you should be able to profit from both a little if you're not greedy.
Sorry am very very new to this stuff what do those abbreviations mean?
SPY is an ETF based on the s&p500. It follows the market. VWAP is volume weighted average. You can set up your chart on your brokerage app to display the VWAP. It's like an anchor the price rebounds to after reaching highs or lows. It's middle ground. If you buy an at the money put and call when the price is at VWAP, you can profit on the price movement of both directions with equal chances of the same movement happening either way. If you set limits on your profits, and don't try and time it yourself you can do good.
Edit: It also protects you so if it runs away in one direction you can cut the loser off and let the other one run with the profit.
Ok thanks I’ll give that a shot
It's basically what your thinking of doing. The basic strategy. You can also sell positions on margin and profit from time decay if the price goes sideways all day. Look up basic options strategies.
User Report | |||
---|---|---|---|
Total Submissions | 0 | First Seen In WSB | 1 year ago |
Total Comments | 0 | Previous Best DD | |
Account Age | 1 year | [^scan ^comment ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_comment&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20comment%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20comment%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.) | [^scan ^submission ](https://www.reddit.com/message/compose/?to=VisualMod&subject=scan_submission&message=Replace%20this%20text%20with%20a%20submission%20ID%20(which%20looks%20like%20h26cq3k)%20to%20have%20the%20bot%20scan%20your%20submission%20and%20correct%20your%20first%20seen%20date.) |
Vote Spam | Click to Vote | Vote Approve | Click to Vote |
^^Discord ^^BanBets ^^VoteBot ^^FAQ ^^Leaderboard ^^- ^^Keep_VM_Alive
This sounds oddly like immediately covering your short position...
Am I missing something here?
It’s basically that but the long/short with slightly more money in it would make a slight profit
With a straddle strategy you loose if the underlying equity/index doesn’t move much in neither direction due to the theta crunch. You need a bigger move up or down.
What’s a theta crunch?
Invest life savings and report back.
Ok-Reputation-1643 t1_iyc6djt wrote
Stay in school.
​
Jokes aside, if you cover every investment exactly with the opposite play, then you'll slowly lose money to transaction costs as it's impossible to gain anything.