Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

VisualMod t1_iueo1nc wrote

>This is interesting evidence that suggests the same developer created both Okinami and SHIB. It would be interesting to see more analysis of the transactions to see if there are any other patterns that could confirm this theory.

2

Deurstopper t1_iuerl53 wrote

Ok, lets talk about the whitepaper..

1

roozter85 t1_iuerw4b wrote

So what your really trying to say isss....

1

Educational-Sir-9614 OP t1_iuesbgh wrote

could end up like Shiba

2

Educational-Sir-9614 OP t1_iuf5gv9 wrote

@Artist_FAChekki Here are the Etherscan/ Blockchain facts in summary from new evidence posted by Andre (please suggest additions/improvements):

  1. Analysis of Okinami transactional pattern from ETH genesis is identical to SHIB, in both velocity and size. This being 101 ETH incoming transfers using aggregated batch jobs. This identical transactional pattern for Okinami occurred 10 days before SHIB. When you look at this evidence it suggests that it’s the same dev and that they created Okinami deployer first, and then SHIB, and went live with Shib as the first community experiment. Okinami is now live, with the contract created a few months ago.

  2. Transactional analysis shows that the message from dev on 21st Jul 2022, including a number 11786 relates to a block number on etherscan. On further investigation this links to Kraken. Both Shib and Okinami have transactions to all 3 of the same crypto exchanges 1. Kraken, 2. Gemini, 3. Poloniex

Https://youtu.be/6gOLfTPoLvc

1