Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

tlsnine t1_j3obzzo wrote

Much better than more war footage!

183

CassandraAnderson t1_j3ohtae wrote

100% agreed. I just sent this to a couple of friends and family along with this comment:

Have you seen this recently uncovered footage from the Philippines in 1942? Sometimes it is hard to wrap your head around the fact that there was a lot more going on than just the holocaust, killing nazis, and the whole Western front.

68

CyberSmurf t1_j3og8s3 wrote

Oh my word! you uncovered an old dog fighting crime ring!!

47

Jarpunter t1_j3pglv3 wrote

Rare footage of a dogfight in the Pacific Theatre during WW2

30

Analog0 t1_j3ota06 wrote

Eye bleach has been around since at least 1942.

41

badbatzmaru_ t1_j3qcknd wrote

For The Record : the Broom the puppy is playing with is called a Walis-tambo

— it’s made from a local grass and my family used it until there was a sizable gap in the middle like missing front teeth — you just had to sweep from the side of the broom until the Whiskers evened out and you had a nub of a broom— that’s when you get a new one

39

pokelord13 t1_j3qvip6 wrote

I knew it was the Philippines as soon as I saw that walis

4

GalileoGalilei2012 t1_j3qyw7x wrote

I knew it was the Philippines as soon as I saw “Philippines 1942”

31

OldBob10 t1_j3vizdx wrote

I figured it was Philadelphia all along because Barbie.

−2

Tempest753 t1_j3prohh wrote

This is very important footage

13

invol713 t1_j3oc3b9 wrote

It’s the WW2 version of the Puppy Bowl.

12

a4techkeyboard t1_j3q3u5h wrote

I guess it's pretty interesting to see a 1942 walis (broom) that seems to be a thicker walis tambo with a heftier handle instead of walis tingting seemingly for outdoor use.

https://www.tagaloglang.com/filipino-brooms/

Walis tambo are usually for indoors, and are smaller/thinner.

12

cambeiu t1_j3q9cj4 wrote

Unleashing the dogs of war.

5

xondk t1_j3q6qfc wrote

Task, find ww2 footage of historical significance.

Failed: not ww2 footage.

Success: puppies are always significant.

You know what, I would still call that a good day at work.

4

unchima t1_j3q9h5i wrote

The fact that someone actually colorized the video too just makes this all the sweeter.

2

ICreditReddit t1_j3qqn2x wrote

Hopefully there's some surviving relatives you could find

2

btruff t1_j3ruzvx wrote

My dad was given his given his engineering degree early to go fight in WWII. Three months of radar training and sent to the Philippines. But winter 1943. Very slim chance but I was hoping to see him.

1

Liftian t1_j3qrn7a wrote

i feel like this also belongs in r/wholesome

2

jherazob t1_j3qn4pb wrote

I see this as an absolute win!

1

UndeadYoshi420 t1_j3qxc8h wrote

That video was horrifyingly graphic. Thanks for the warning.

1

vagabondvisions t1_j3r1irr wrote

The level of mental and emotional steeling myself that I did before clicking the play button on that, only to be delightfully relieved.

1

jtsfour2 t1_j3r6ads wrote

Think about how many dog generations have passed since then. In human equivalent generations how far back would we be?

1300s?

1

Malthus1 t1_j3rf0aq wrote

Cry “havoc!”, and let slip the dogs of war.

1

ufotheater t1_j3rya2e wrote

The very first Puppy Bowl

1

geekmansworld t1_j3sgkse wrote

"It wasn't the footage I wanted. It was the footage I needed."

1

chixelys t1_j3r7jyg wrote

It’s film, you can literally look at it with a backlight and see what’s on it

−3

lemlurker t1_j3rd1o2 wrote

Assumes it starts right away or you have the means to unwise and rewind without damage, safer to just get it digitisd

4

chixelys t1_j3rekqe wrote

I mean if you digitize it you unwind it as well, part of the process but I get what you’re saying

2

The_Janitors_Mop t1_j3rl03j wrote

Cant open this to normal air if its been sealed for that long, needs treated.

2

its8up t1_j3q0m9h wrote

Meh. I'm sure it's a great video, but twatter. :(

−5

Riegel_Haribo t1_j3prc2q wrote

That's a fantastical story, but one only needs to look at the film to see what's on it.

−10

MrScrib t1_j3qay7j wrote

Not if the film hasn't been developed and you don't trust yourself to develop film that's 80 years old.

6