Submitted by orange_wires t3_10of3ld in vermont
HeadPen5724 t1_j6i5p4c wrote
Reply to comment by thomcchester in Debating ranked-choice voting in Vermont by orange_wires
If that were true, the Franklin county sheriffs race would’ve turned out differently snd David zuckerman wouldn’t have been reelected.
thomcchester t1_j6i6idd wrote
Evidence? How the hell do you know that changed anything
HeadPen5724 t1_j6i940i wrote
Well, this thread alone showed that most people didn’t realize Zuckerman blatantly stole taxpayer funds. As for the sheriff, do you really think people would have voted for a guy that openly abused handcuffed people on camera if they actually knew about it. on top of that, a previous poster on this thread, who is an advocate, has stated that party affiliation is necessary, because people don’t know the candidates name. Do you have any evidence suggesting otherwise?
HeadPen5724 t1_j6i9o2v wrote
Also, many posters on this thread, I’ve already stated that they vote a party ticket without learning the candidates. I could go back and find the post, but it doesn’t seem to be a very controversial position that some people vote for party without getting to know the candidate
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments