Submitted by Ok_Reference_9222 t3_y7aa8w in vermont
Optimized_Orangutan t1_iste3ra wrote
In sales I refer to this as a "Buy in" filter. They have a capacity they cannot exceed, they don't want to waste space on lookeylous and bored people just being there to be there. Their vendors want to maximize their exposure to paying customers, not just their exposure. Charging a cover fee stops the "we'll walk around and not buy anything because walking is free" crowd. Means people who are inside wanted to be inside bad enough to spend 10 bucks.
ThisistheInfiniteIs t1_isuo8qh wrote
This, also, it sounds like it is working as intended.
Kyzer t1_iswz0ne wrote
Then they should consider returning 50% of the cover if there is a proof of purchase from a vendor.
Optimized_Orangutan t1_isy4lq0 wrote
why? Another principle of sales, once you have their money you don't give it back.
Edit: if not getting that 10 bucks back means you don't enter... then the filter is doing it's job. it's not their job to maximize enjoyment for people who don't want to pay, it's to maximize profits from the event for the venue and the vendors.
flambeaway t1_iswc2dc wrote
If that was the goal, they should issue vouchers.
Like drink tickets at a beer festival.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments