Comments
zonitronic t1_iu8j0hf wrote
Malloy
He's also a carpetbagger.
mycophdstudent t1_iu8o0zi wrote
Is there a quote you can link to where we can read exactly what he supports about Jan 6?
ARealVermontar t1_iu8oull wrote
>Asked about the Jan. 6 insurrection at the Capitol, Malloy told Vermont Public he “wished” he’d been there to protest, but added that the people who broke the law — such as those who attacked law enforcement officers — need to be held accountable.
Traditional_Lab_5468 t1_iu8ouyo wrote
/r/titlegore
DamonKatze t1_iu8tbyq wrote
Why does he want to legalize eagles asshole, and which eagle in particular?
therealrico t1_iu8vh5a wrote
I mean his support of protests over an “illegal election” isn’t a great look either. Nor is his belief there should be a federal abortion ban, no exceptions. Sigh.
likeahurricane t1_iu8z4ww wrote
Ah yes I see he espouses the position of “just the tip” when it comes to insurrection.
jaredh_d2012 t1_iu913sn wrote
Scary Bird Man thinks dumb things.
TheTrickyThird t1_iu96x8j wrote
Scary seditious eagle man
beatrixotter t1_iu9bd29 wrote
Isn't the word "cloaca"?
QuicheSmash t1_iu9cfkg wrote
All of his positions are terrible. He poses it saying he's "concerned about the direction of our country" and then it's just a laundry list of terrible positions.
Civil-Drive t1_iu9e6qm wrote
Keep getting texts asking for my support from his people, I just keep telling them to go fuck themselves.
kazame t1_iu9mwtb wrote
We didn't take Trump seriously in 2016, look at how that turned out
Walnut2001 t1_iu9nagq wrote
Yeah...he’s awful. Read his stance on stuff. He tried to compare Biden’s presidency to watergate 😂
Mechanicjohn12 t1_iu9nbof wrote
Something I agree with entirely!!! Conservatives DO hate democracy!
Probably because they uphold a Republic.
Which is what the United States of America is and always has been; a Constitutional Republic with democratically elected officials.
raincntry t1_iu9nq2i wrote
Look at the pedantic brain on Mechanicjohn12! Nice that you can be both right and wrong at the same time.
Quirfg t1_iu9o1jc wrote
Check out this chucklefuck and his "states rights" civil war posts.
Apprehensive_Pop_305 t1_iu9o58s wrote
Getting someone's name right is a sign of respect.
Mechanicjohn12 t1_iu9ol6x wrote
“States rights” is literally the core of our government structure but okay.
eye-brows t1_iu9ou0t wrote
The state's right to.... what, John? Wanna finish that sentence?
Mechanicjohn12 t1_iu9qdy6 wrote
States right to what? What do you want me to say?
I disagree vehemently with the concept of slavery, if that’s your question, and believe or Constitution through the rights awarded would make slavery federally illegal since it was created and signed.
I DONT think states have a right to enslave a human being, for any reason.
You idiots are trying to turn an incredibly nuanced and difficult historical time of our nation into a simple one sentence reason or answer.
The original 7 states that seceded from the Union absolutely did so over slavery. The Union actually allowed and upheld slavery in several states throughout the war. The Emancipation Proclamation only freed slaves held within the rebelling territories, NOT in the several Union states which still had slaves.
There were 7 original secede states. The other 4 seceded AFTER Lincoln mobilized 75,000 Union soldiers to quash the rebellion by force. Those 4 states were not fighting specifically for slavery (played a factor) but their main disagreements were by the violence and overreach presented from the federal government. It rang a lot like Britain prior to the Revolutionary war.
Only ~5% of the south were slave owners. Most of the slave owners never picked up a rifle to defend the institution of slavery. Ask yourself why did the poor men of the south decide to fight and die against the Union? Was it because they just loved slavery?
Or was it because they began to see the Union (aka federal government) literally enter their states and burn and pillage the homes of their friends and families who had NO relation to slavery or even southern politics.
Union soldiers did not fight to even end slavery for the most part. The whole war was mostly fought because the “Union” could not be allowed to dissolve, too much had been lost to get to the point in which they were at.
I will never defend the south and their “right” to slavery as I don’t think anybody has a right to own human beings, and believe the Constitution to clearly outline all the human rights which would expressly disallow the practice of slavery.
Blueheartt t1_iu9qopd wrote
I love how angry vermonters get over Republicans haha. So much anger, the dark side is strong with you
Quirfg t1_iu9r0ps wrote
Could this brain be any smoother, even Neil Tyson would agree this would be smoother than the earth is shrank down.
zonitronic t1_iu9r377 wrote
...or simply just common courtesy. Personally, I don't care for Malloy's politics and I do not believe the best interests of the people of Vermont are as much as a priority for him as is his promoting his fascist agenda.
ManOfDrinks t1_iu9rfmp wrote
Trump wasn't running in a race that was going to be an obviously one-sided hulk smash.
woburnite t1_iu9rt1q wrote
thank you for your service.
ThisistheInfiniteIs t1_iu9sva9 wrote
"Deplorable Malloy"
ThisistheInfiniteIs t1_iu9t8y7 wrote
Deplorable
InternationalToe3621 t1_iu9t9ch wrote
He's just some asinine troll. If you look at his comment history, you'll see he just posts asinine shit in each state's subreddit. Probably couldn't even find Vermont on a map
KyleShittenHouse69 t1_iu9tfqf wrote
Republics are democracies. This is a precocious 7th grader’s argument. Very stupid.
therealrico t1_iu9u9zh wrote
Agreed, but whom I replied to was asking for context regarding the quote. And from that we get these additional pieces of information that aren’t very popular in our state.
Mechanicjohn12 t1_iu9v8qe wrote
I’m actually a landowner in VT;)
vpu7 t1_iu9vi6w wrote
You can be both, exhibit a ^
Jerry_Williams69 t1_iu9zpsp wrote
*Trumpers
Most Vermonters don't mind sane Republicans. That's why Phil Scott is our governor and Malloy is lining up to be blown out.
deadowl t1_iua5eaz wrote
Yes, the term cloaca is the correct one for the poop-exit/egg-exit/sperm-entrance/sperm-exit chute of a bird.
deadowl t1_iua601e wrote
Are you saying the attack at Fort Sumter was a Union act of aggression?
Edit to add: what about all those attacks suppressing free elections in "Bleeding Kansas" against anti-slavery settlements preceding Lincoln's election?
Another edit re: Bleeding Kansas: There's literally misinformation on abolitionist gravestones there going into the 1900s so that they wouldn't get disturbed. For instance, this guy who has close Y-DNA markers to people paternally descended from ancestors of mine.
[deleted] t1_iua83ql wrote
[deleted]
Maleficent_Rope_7844 t1_iua9alm wrote
You do know the governor is a republican, right?
fjwjr t1_iuaa0qe wrote
It’s Vermont. Who isn’t?
MoreTuple t1_iuaaneu wrote
So was the Soviet Union technically a republic. I guess you're emphasizing the republic aspect because you're ok switching to communism run by authoritarians. As long as we're a republic...
fjwjr t1_iuaclei wrote
I searched his site and found no stance on stuff. I’d really like to know his stance on stuff. Stuff is everywhere. I have a house full of stuff. I was driving down the road and saw a bunch of stuff. I turned on the radio and heard a bunch of stuff. Opened the newspaper and there was stuff there too! Something really needs to be done about all that stuff and I’d like to know what his position is on it.
Now I’ve got to go out in the yard and rake some leaves without stepping in some of the dog’s stuff…
beatrixotter t1_iuah09q wrote
They've really streamlined things, haven't they?
Mechanicjohn12 t1_iuahbbm wrote
The Soviet Union was not a republic at all.
A Republic is a form of government where leaders are freely elected to represent the constituents moving forward.
Little_Art8272 t1_iuahelt wrote
I like Trumpster better... It rhymes with dumpster 😂😂😂
Mechanicjohn12 t1_iuahwm7 wrote
No, that’s not even remotely what I am saying.
The attack on fort Sumter had nothing to do with slavery and was purely about jurisdiction at that point. The south claimed the fort as their own, and that it was there property as it was within their borders.
The attack at fort Sumter was clearly southern aggression; albeit nobody died during the “battle”. Hell, nobody even knew that the attack of Sumter would be the “beginning” of the Civil War.
Mechanicjohn12 t1_iuahz4d wrote
Nah, not a troll by any means.
My beliefs are genuine.
deadowl t1_iuai2ne wrote
You've breezed over my points on what had already been going on in Kansas though.
Mechanicjohn12 t1_iuaiecw wrote
What happened in Kansas, I would say, was internal struggles being propagated by both political factions trying to plant their foot to gain control.
Slavery back then was a massive ethical issue for the nation. People were willing to kill both to uphold the institutions, and to abolish.
Edit: you didn’t even respond to what I had said
deadowl t1_iuaievj wrote
Gotta wonder if laying eggs is pleasurable for chickens at this point, haven't done any research there though. In the meantime it's not as streamlined as on in/out receptacle as they still eat with mouths.
deadowl t1_iuaj4f2 wrote
Nope, I'm saying you gave an incomplete response.
Walnut2001 t1_iuaj4jx wrote
I can’t tell if this is some bit or...?
Mechanicjohn12 t1_iuajkrf wrote
Holy shit I have never once said it wasn’t about slavery or the CW not being about slavery.
Mechanicjohn12 t1_iuajmju wrote
Nah dude you’re just unwilling to actually engage and discuss
deadowl t1_iuajx0b wrote
Your words:
> Only ~5% of the south were slave owners. Most of the slave owners never picked up a rifle to defend the institution of slavery. Ask yourself why did the poor men of the south decide to fight and die against the Union? Was it because they just loved slavery?
Mechanicjohn12 t1_iuak5yb wrote
Can you critically read? Is that me saying the CW wasn’t fought over slavery, or that the people who actually fought the battles had nothing at all to do with slavery?
deadowl t1_iuaka3b wrote
Those people interfering in elections in Kansas certainly were supportive of slavery. How many of them were actually slave holders?
Edit to add: https://eldridgehotel.com/2021/06/history/
InternationalToe3621 t1_iuamom2 wrote
Also in Texas and Massachusetts?
Mechanicjohn12 t1_iuamspy wrote
Yes and yes.
InternationalToe3621 t1_iuamzyr wrote
Wow thats quite a coincidence, I also owe a home in every state and also on the moon
Mechanicjohn12 t1_iuan1pi wrote
You probably don’t own shit
fjwjr t1_iuarjbn wrote
….and yet you downvoted it anyway.
Amyarchy t1_iuarlen wrote
I'll bet you're fun at parties.
AllyEmmie t1_iuato3m wrote
What else do you want this subreddit to be talking about DURING ELECTION SEASON? Moron.
Jolly_Weather_1624 t1_iuavpf4 wrote
I support what they did, just why they did it is the stupidest of reasons
smcski t1_iuazm38 wrote
What’s wrong with just not responding?
Walnut2001 t1_iub0mss wrote
...yet I didn’t, i will no tho lol
fjwjr t1_iub11ro wrote
Yup, sure.
Walnut2001 t1_iub1g7f wrote
Ok I’ll take it away now as proof
VoyageursWitch t1_iub34td wrote
Insurectionists are terrorists and should be sent to Guantanamo.
kier00 t1_iub4dce wrote
I am blown away by the high level of political discourse in this thread my bad.
Successful_Order_638 t1_iub70fq wrote
Then how would they know they can go fuck themselves?
Somebody needs to tell them. Often and in no uncertain terms.
AllyEmmie t1_iubbbkf wrote
You are in the minority. Politics are important to our livelihood. Keep not giving a shit about how this state or country is run and eventually you’ll have no friends and no rights.
murrly t1_iubdex2 wrote
lol I don't understand why this sub is so worried about the dude.
A dog's shit would be a republican for senate here.
amardas t1_iubitbv wrote
This explains how it is 30% of free families in southern states were slave owners: https://socialequity.duke.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/8.10.20.pdf
I am sure the others would have, but for a lack of wealth.
DeliriousBlues t1_iubjtq3 wrote
Must be from out of state and currently out of touch with reality. Normal local Republicans are fine. The current batshit crazy national Republicans are a menace.
Walnut2001 t1_iubk5ut wrote
Aaaand back to downvote
fjwjr t1_iubk9w8 wrote
Walnut2001 t1_iubkeo1 wrote
Yesssiiir
BosskHogg t1_iuby5nw wrote
OMG. Thanks you!!
[deleted] t1_iuc4gq2 wrote
[deleted]
kier00 t1_iuc74j6 wrote
I am in the minority of what? Is being in the minority a good or bad thing?
AllyEmmie t1_iucdetx wrote
Not caring about politics or the direction our state and country moves in.
Thank god the majority of us DO care, otherwise this would be a fascist dictatorship.
bigtimesauce t1_iud1f8g wrote
You can just admit you eat paste, that’s OK
kier00 t1_iud84gn wrote
I disagree with every assertion and argument you made.
AllyEmmie t1_iudps00 wrote
If you care about politics as much as everyone else on this sub, during election season, WHY are you bitching about it?
ArkeryStarkery t1_iudsuqn wrote
You don't remember how people talked about Trump in spring of 2016 at all, huh?
ManOfDrinks t1_iuefj4z wrote
There's a difference between what people say about a candidate 6 months before an election and what data-driven polls say two weeks before an election.
daemonium1 t1_iuhlehu wrote
> I will never defend the south and their “right” to slavery
You just wrote 10 paragraphs literally doing that. I suggest you really think about what you stand for in life, if you are writing manifestos defending slavery (which, again, is exactly what you are doing).
Most_Expert_8080 t1_iu8iouh wrote
Who