Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

BillBikesInCleveland t1_ja33npd wrote

And here's what you don't understand, Rama.

I don't care if Becca was aware of what FTX was about. They are a crypto firm. Crypto is a horrible industry for the environment and crypto serves no practical purpose. One can't be both a steward of the environment and a friend of crypto. I can't think of a worse industry to owe millions of dollars of favors to, except for fossil fuels.

The fact that she owed crypto is troubling enough for me and others to want to know the truth about these deals.

Did she do anything wrong is a tough question to answer. If FTX hadn't collapsed she would have been in a very corruptible position and that's worry enough for me.

6

RamaSchneider OP t1_ja383by wrote

You ARE finding out the details.

I have seen ZERO evidence that Balint acted or would have acted in any way corrupt regardless the exposure of the FTX cash.

Your statements of fact if asked as questions would make fair questions that demand answers. You gratuitous assertion of fact regard Balint and her motivations truly demand you go back and find answers to the questions.

But that's just my opinion.

1

flambeaway t1_ja6doj5 wrote

If I run ads that say "BillBikesInCleveland is great!" what do you owe me?

1