Submitted by twentiesforever t3_10wm8vs in vermont
Necessary_Cat_4801 t1_j7rgmfp wrote
Reply to comment by mattgm1995 in How Can We The Increase Affordable Housing Supply? Ideas? by twentiesforever
You're confusing tourism with second homes.
mattgm1995 t1_j7rgvqx wrote
Many people in tourist towns have second homes. There are tens of thousands of second homes and condos in ski towns, in hunting areas, around lakes. The two are related
Necessary_Cat_4801 t1_j7rhs3w wrote
Any place that has an economy based on one industry is in bad shape. VT would do well to stop worrying about outside money and start worrying about its residents while it still has some left.
VT should be taxing second homes to the point where they are just not affordable and people are forced to sell. Way too many people here don't have one home. It's a bit greedy to have seconds while some people are still hungry.
mattgm1995 t1_j7rj9gw wrote
There’s plenty of empty land in VT. Why don’t you build more instead of punishing people who enjoy spending time in the state? Tourism supplies 10% of VTs jobs, skiing isn’t going away, and outsiders bring $3B into Vermont yearly. You want to lose that?
Necessary_Cat_4801 t1_j7rjqli wrote
I don't necessarily want to lose tourism. I'm fine with people not being able to afford a second home here. Most of the tourism in Burlington comes from Quebec. They aren't going to stop coming. If we lost the NJ/NYC/MA crowd and gained workforce housing, that would be a win for the state.
As an nonresident, you seem to be missing that VT does whatever it can to fight sprawl. That's why we have open land. Most of us want real jobs, not jobs waiting on rich people.
mattgm1995 t1_j7rk6wl wrote
Most of burlingtons tourism is from the rest of New England. And much of it is from people who have second homes and want to go out in Burlington. As a resident who is super entrenched in their position I think you’re missing the ramifications. Also, no one is stopping you from getting a good paying remote job. Major employers aren’t going to suddenly move campuses and jobs to Vermont because “housing is available”
Necessary_Cat_4801 t1_j7rkm2l wrote
Lol. OK. I have a job. I don't want a remote job, that sounds miserable. I'd rather live and work in my community.
mattgm1995 t1_j7rksv5 wrote
What do you expect these high paying jobs that suddenly flood the state when we all leave to be?
Necessary_Cat_4801 t1_j7rl77f wrote
I don't see the connection. Housing would be more attainable.
Tourism jobs don't pay livable wages anyway and soon there won't be anyone to fill them.
mattgm1995 t1_j7rlhnj wrote
You said “most of us want real jobs, not jobs waiting on rich people”. If you lose 30,000 jobs, what jobs do you think will suddenly appear?
Necessary_Cat_4801 t1_j7rm0hv wrote
30k seems very high, and pretty arbitrary and pretty pulled out of your ass.
I really don't care what you think, honestly.
If you think people are happy to work minimum wage jobs with no benefits, instead of having available housing that's great. Good for you.
Most people in VT don't work in tourism. We can't hire teachers at the moment because we don't have housing. If we lost second homes, people would still come. Not a problem.
mattgm1995 t1_j7rmd6n wrote
http://accd.vermont.gov/tourism/research before you go insulting me and since you clearly haven’t done one ounce of research, it’s from your own states website.
And I don’t think that. I’m just asking you, where do you expect jobs to appear from? What companies are moving 30k jobs to Vermont?
Necessary_Cat_4801 t1_j7rmsz7 wrote
Dude, seriously. I don't care. People who have enough money to have a second home in VT are a tiny percentage. The vast majority of tourists don't own second homes here. We would still have tourists without second homes, this argument is just stupid.
mattgm1995 t1_j7rn3hq wrote
Not going to address you insulted me despite the numbers coming from your own states website? I’d argue a significant amount of money comes from people who spend their weekends and vacations at second homes in Vermont, spending money in restaurants, gas stations, mom and pop stores, etc but it doesn’t affect me if you can’t understand how the world works. Because it’s going to keep working whether you’re onboard or not.
Necessary_Cat_4801 t1_j7rnlaw wrote
Jesus. It's reddit. Get over yourself for fucks sake.
"I'd argue a significant..." is not a meaningful statistic, and the state doesn't live to serve you and will be fine without you.
Good fucking christ rich people are the worst.
mattgm1995 t1_j7ro813 wrote
It’s Reddit. Okay. “Get over yourself for fucks sake” Here goes then. Save money and buy a house. If you can’t afford it, get a better job. If you can’t find a better job, move to a state with high paying jobs, and if you can’t change your living situation, grow up and look at the hand you’ve given yourself and deal with it.
Necessary_Cat_4801 t1_j7roi54 wrote
Lol. I have an advanced degree and a good job. The cost of housing in VT is completely divorced from wages in VT. We're trying to fix it. One of the fixes is making homes available for residents. Deal with it.
mattgm1995 t1_j7rot1k wrote
You think this is a uniquely Vermont problem? I live in Eastern MA and also can’t afford to live in a nice town. On a six figure salary. This is a New England problem. Vermont is in a better place than MA tho since they at least have land to build
Necessary_Cat_4801 t1_j7rpddn wrote
Maybe sell your other fucking house? Jesus.
mattgm1995 t1_j7rpzs5 wrote
It’s our family home, not mine. Point being, it’s not a Vermont issue. Kicking everyone out isn’t going to help you
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments