raznov1 t1_j289ofn wrote
Not to be "that guy", but that number probably included a very significant number of "prank calls"
mdjnsn t1_j295aw4 wrote
As someone who's volunteered on a similar hotline for several years, they account for that and don't count those.
I worked on a crisis hotline for sexual assault issues, and we definitely got a lot of what we called "inappropriate use calls". That included anything from prank calls, to people calling for issues completely unrelated to what we did, to people calling just to chat for some reason. Basically, any call that didn't match the purpose of the hotline and organization.
It was important for us to have accurate numbers regarding how many clients we actually served, for our reporting for things like donations and grants. The executives running the organization took that very seriously, of course.
So while I don't know how this group records their data necessarily, I have no doubt that they know how to filter real calls from fake ones and report accordingly.
raznov1 t1_j2agg8q wrote
I'm moderately confident though not convinced that this hotline does a similar process as you described. I'm 100% not confident the author of this article would have made that distinction.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments