Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Kittenfabstodes t1_ivlvsoo wrote

14

[deleted] t1_ivt28xq wrote

[deleted]

1

Kittenfabstodes t1_ivtkej3 wrote

>we declared everything might have been fictional if we had no physical evidence of it.

Hmmm. Seems strangely familiar.

So what your saying is, if there wasn't physical evidence of it's existence, like Troy or maybe Atlantis, we declared it never existed.

There was no written record about Gobleki Tepe which is probably one of the most important archeological sites in the world and when it was discovered, it changed everything we thought we knew about about man from 12,000 years ago.

All I'm saying is just because we don't have any other written record of Atlantis doesn't mean there weren't written records that didn't survive. It probably didn't exist, but it's not a zero percent chance it didn't exist.

Things like evidence or written records have a tendency being getting lost or being destroyed due to a variety of factors. Plato existed less than 2500 years ago. Gobleki Tepe is 12,000 years old. That's almost 10,000 years in between Gobleki Tepe and Plato. How much has been lost to use since Plato so ask yourself how much has been lost since Gobleki Tepe?

1

Jorge5934 t1_ivm9yux wrote

When was Troy fictional?

−9

Kittenfabstodes t1_ivmiz42 wrote

Before they found it but after it actually existed.

2

Jorge5934 t1_ivmjnvb wrote

Ah! So you claim it was thought to be fictional, but I guess they looked for it despite your better judgment? The nerve of these people!

−3