Submitted by silask93 t3_z1k447 in todayilearned
Comments
Seamus_the_shameless t1_ixbluwv wrote
He possibly felt pressure to publish exciting results. Once you set the bar for yourself at discovering elements, there isn't much wiggle room.
Shiny_Deleter t1_ixbnubq wrote
Those physicists, always looking to make a quick buck.
charliespider t1_ixbrxts wrote
But it's also peer reviewed and if results are not reproducible then those results are ultimately discarded, especially when better science comes along.
[deleted] t1_ixbv50x wrote
[deleted]
Codithrowaway t1_ixc4web wrote
Two more and he'd get a 6th for free.
BobsReddit_ t1_ixcl0bt wrote
Because you are asking if we should trust science. We can. Just have to go through the process correctly as this person said
[deleted] t1_ixcod64 wrote
[deleted]
4thofeleven t1_ixcpz5j wrote
There's some evidence that at least some of his work on those elements was also initially falsified - it seems like he was faking data to get the results he expected so he could claim the discovery ahead of any other team, and then conducting the experiments properly later.
It's just that the first few times, his hypothesis about the qualities of the new elements proved correct enough that his 'results' could be duplicated and so nobody looked closely at his work, while with the later elements, he was way off and nobody else could get results even close to what he was claiming.
MPCNPC t1_ixkuluu wrote
Do people get one downvote and delete their account??
JaydedMermaid3D t1_ixbjvx8 wrote
I don't get it. He had already found 3 elements (co-found technically) what's the motivation for more?