Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

jsilv0 t1_ivb2wrr wrote

Because that kind of obscenity was to be reserved for the real life British high society

68

Landlubber77 t1_ivb37to wrote

I wonder if issue 11 was actually better than 12, like how Game of Thrones would always have the penultimate episode of the season be the banger while the season finale more or less dealt with the aftermath and set-up for the next season.

3

Gemmabeta t1_ivb3w7a wrote

> The topics depicted in the novels and poems were wide-ranging, including women's suffrage, physical disability, sexual impairment, secret sex societies, bestiality, India-rubber dildos, slave rape, duels, mock crucifixions, Turkish harems, and prophylactic devices. The Pearl often contained extensive political commentary, including references to the Reform Bills and Contagious Diseases Acts.

Back when people preferred to intersperse their wanking with deep discussions on the property requirement for voting.

211

[deleted] t1_ivb3xwi wrote

The fiction magazine pearl was banned for writing about real life pearl necklaces.

5

UsrnameInATrenchcoat t1_ivb46r1 wrote

This so vulgar and crass that I'm gonna jerk off to rule 34 just to wash the taste off my muff maraudor

8

TaleWrong6444 t1_ivb4vxd wrote

Wait until they hear about the royal family...

1

enderandrew42 t1_ivb552e wrote

The joke used to be "I only read Playboy for the articles", but in reality it had tons of great journalism, short fiction and very few pages of nudes. People were interspersing their wanks with political commentary with Playboy.

132

A40 t1_ivbb80v wrote

It was sub-standard obscenity?

1

TishMiAmor t1_ivbkrh1 wrote

If I know one thing about Victorian erotica it’s that flagellation will be heavily featured. I always wonder whether it was a genuinely more prevalent kink at the time, whether authors at the time just automatically assumed their audiences would want a whipping scene, or some combination of both.

18

Xanlthorpe t1_ivbvivb wrote

I read a copy of The Pearl back in the early 80s. It was being circulated as "historical fiction." It was no more scandalous than the average Penthouse Letter to the Editor or story of the 80s.

6

Positive-Source8205 t1_ivc1vtf wrote

“To the editor of The Pearl: A Magazine of Facetiae and Voluptuous Reading

Sir: I never though this would befall me …”

17

srv50 t1_ivcaqpn wrote

They had standards for obscenity!!??!! /s

3

Flicksterea t1_ivcblng wrote

'Rampant engine of love' is a phrase new to me. I'm going to have many laughs reading these. My lesbian sensibilities are positively tickled.

9

Fickle-Friendship-31 t1_ivclzww wrote

I had a book with a bunch of the stories from this newsletter. Wild shit.

1

contacts_eyes t1_ivd4rdk wrote

This post brought up a memory of when i was like ten or eleven and my cousin had some edgy magazine, it wasnt like a playboy or anything but it definitely had some weird content, anyway it was just there in her room and I decided to look at it one day. The last few pages had an erotic story in it and it was about a guy who went to a female dom and she made him drink pee. That shit is still burned on my psyche because up until that point I don’t think i had read anything that weird before.

3

karrimycele t1_ivdt5mn wrote

Had a copy of the book as a youngster in the seventies, (1970s). They compiled the whole thing. And, yes, I was using it for its intended purpose.

1

HankHippoppopalous t1_ivdtjbd wrote

Like. I feel like I still could rub one off whilst reading about the dart of love all impatient to enter the mossy grotto between your thighs....

1

nerdwa t1_ive9kcd wrote

I read a copy of The Pearl when I was in middle school. Mines was written by John Steinbeck though.

3

Carighan t1_ivebnva wrote

It's always weird to me because it's difficult to know how to feel about it, but yeah. The publisher Hugh Hefner did some amazing work, even though as a boss and a person he apparently was an utter asshole from all I can find on it.

4

Y34rZer0 t1_ivefsvw wrote

there’s a cool documentary on the black propaganda (sexual propaganda) unit the British very reluctantly ran during World War II. There is a female artist on it who tells a story about creating an image of Hitler with his penis out. She said the rather stuffy British offices directed her to draw it, then after a pause added ‘ don’t make it too large‘

1

drekwithoutpolitics t1_ivfesyd wrote

Can someone tell me what the fuck “simultaneously” means in the title?

They were simultaneously devoted to sex, incest, and flagellation?

The issues were simultaneously published?

“Three erotic tales simultaneously,”

r/Titlegore

1

RedYakArt t1_ivfwdw6 wrote

Did they promote rape, bestiality, incest, etc or just report on it?

1