Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

goshdammitfromimgur t1_isnje5b wrote

4

bluaqua t1_isoahp8 wrote

Technically a ute is different from a pick-up truck. It’s come to mean the same thing now, but the original utes are actually a “utility coupé.” Notably, it’s the front part that’s different. The front of a ute is a sedan, just with the trunk sawed off and replaced with a tray. This is different from the American roadster utility, which was a soft-top. The modern pick-up I’d say has more of a trunk front, and is still different from the classic Commodore or something.

I found this out when I was curious as to why the ute has its own wiki. Turns out it literally is a different thing, way back when it was first invented.

12

goshdammitfromimgur t1_ispz5vv wrote

I have always heard the justification was that the "Australian ute" was unibody and pick ups have a seperate tray. The 1927 Chev national roadster is unibody and was available as a coupe and four door sedan.

So that meets both our requirements for an "Australian ute" but built before the first one in Geelong.

2

ArmageddonSnakeEye t1_isom8yh wrote

Tldr: the front of our truck looks different so we claim to have made an entire new thing.

1

TheSpoonKing t1_isqhr2a wrote

So you would argue an SUV, a crossover, and a sedan are all basically the same thing and just look different, and theres no reason to bother classifying them separately at all? LMFAO

2

ArmageddonSnakeEye t1_isqigkw wrote

Those are different. You're talking about a truck and just calling it another name. Aussies and their pridefulness

1

TheSpoonKing t1_isqk2q3 wrote

I'm Canadian, and all I'm defending is the initial creation of the term, not the continued use of it to refer to vehicles that don't necessarily conform to its original requirements.

2