Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

ElTontoDelPueblo t1_itdfvg8 wrote

56

Sugar_buddy t1_itdh1ye wrote

I was thinking this too. If I were to compose emails like this, I would be told to stop it, lol. I feel that we have a lot more information to convey than letters by overseas post back In those days ever had to process, so I think our values have just changed. We can't be long-winded and focused on prose because we have stacks and stacks of communications records stored up in the back room. We need to convey information in shorter, more efficient ways since there's so much taking up our time during the day, so we value convenience.

33

das_thorn t1_itdib3c wrote

Winston Churchill was an utter master of the English language.

25

platitood t1_itedzk3 wrote

Are you comparing a cheeky letter with extra formality added for effect written by a master of the English language, to your work emails?

Next up: were the top painters of the Renaissance better than my webcomic?

14

Pbadger8 t1_itfkhqx wrote

That’s a really weird and rude way to respond, dude…

It’s a valid observation that sheer volume of correspondence humans have with eachother in the 21st century might… you know, influence how we talk and write compared to correspondence in 1899.

−1

DryCoughski t1_ite0386 wrote

It's not oddly satisfying, it's completely understandably satisfying!
The eloquence of the people of yesteryear is a pleasure to hear/read, and it seems that that level of command of the English language is pretty rare these days, unfortunately.

7