Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Longjumping_Owl5740 t1_isesnc6 wrote

I don't know anything about this case in particular, but here's the probable answer.

Legally speaking, he's made the donation "out of the goodness of his heart" expecting nothing in return and they'vr has chosen of their own free will to name the building after him. They aren't technically "obligated" to do so because there's no legally binding agreement. If they changed the name tomorrow, he'd have no recourse to sue or expect his money back. Obviously he gave the money with the understanding that the university agreed to name the building after him, but since they aren't "forced" to do so it still counts as a donation.

Source: I work for a prominent university that handles these sorts of things all the time.

0

hisroyalnastiness t1_isfinl4 wrote

If that's how it works why pay the previous family $15M, just so they don't make a fuss?

1