Submitted by iamasinglepotassium t3_126mz9g in todayilearned
Comments
Downtown_Tadpole_817 t1_jea2pta wrote
I'm so sorry
tipdrill541 t1_jea5e9l wrote
Not surprising considering all those strange religious groups like the mennonites and amish came from Europe. Their presence must exist there somewhere
Pherllerp t1_jea6djc wrote
Bummer.
liniel99 t1_jea88wq wrote
I thought every country had a Bible belt?
Gulbahar-00 t1_jea9jf9 wrote
Some have a Quran belt or a Vedas belt
apathy_corp t1_jeakx2k wrote
I am very sorry, Netherlands.
ST616 t1_jealkuy wrote
In the Dutch Bible Belt there are areas where up to 35% of voters vote for the Reformed Political Party (Staatkundig Gereformeerde Partij or SGP). The party was officially oppossed to women's sufferage until the late 1980s. The didn't allow women to be members until they were forced to in the mid 2000s, and they only changed because of the threat of a loss in public funding. The female members that did join were only allowed to stand for office because of another threat of loosing public funding in the 2010s.
NoWarmEmbrace t1_jeam6e2 wrote
Fun fact; The Pennsylvania Dutch for instance aren't Dutch but German. But 'German' in german = Deutsch, so it got morphed into Dutch.
So the Pennsylvania Dutch are in fact the Pennsylvania Deutsch, with german heritage.
NoWarmEmbrace t1_jeamwig wrote
In for instance Staphorst, a village in the belt, just installed their first female City Councillor in 2022.
Edit: Not because no one wanted before but because "the woman is inferior to the man so they can't sit on a council where their descisions are made for men".
pewpewpewouch t1_jeaoxiz wrote
Yep. Unvaccinated too. They got a measles issue a few years ago. Quite a few kids got seriously sick but because the hospitals are situated in vaccinated areas the 'umbrella-effect' kept it from spreading further. Luckily only one youth, (a 17 year old girl), died.
TouristNo4039 t1_jeapcx2 wrote
Making the Netherlands a theocracy is literally on their agenda. I don't understand why parties like that are allowed when they want to get rid of elections and democracy all together.
Epyr t1_jeardxm wrote
Though some may have been from the Netherlands as there wasn't historically as much distinction between the Dutch and Germans as their is today.
ST616 t1_jeauc6m wrote
Luckily they're not going to be able to come close to achieving their aims.
They aren't very big, but they are a lot bigger than most people would imagine given the Netherland's reputation for social liberalism.
RedTheDopeKing t1_jeax6jb wrote
Shit in Canada every province has a Bible Belt
Turtle_Shaft t1_jeb33pd wrote
There’s religious people in other countries? Who would have known
leeuwerik t1_jeb49eg wrote
If you are really referring to the SGP your statement is just baloney. The SGP is the one party that alsways cites the constitution. Hell even their name refers to the constitution.
I'm not a fan of them because they sleep with their bibles but there is really no agenda to go theocracy.
Dragmire800 t1_jeb5mgq wrote
Europeans are, on a whole, a lot less religious than Americans, and unlike the US, where religious belief is holding steady, Religion is very quickly plummeting in Europe.
arcosapphire t1_jeb8csv wrote
> Luckily they're not going to be able to come close to achieving their aims.
I used to say the same about people wanting to repeal Roe v. Wade. I think maybe let's not assume what can or can't happen.
Turtle_Shaft t1_jeb9esj wrote
Thats true but religious people still exist so obviously its not surprising that there are religious parts of a country. Also i wouldn’t call europe with a broad stroke as eastern and Southern Europe are quite religous and muslim immigrants aren’t abandoning their religion upon entering a european country.
[deleted] t1_jeb9o3m wrote
[deleted]
SuedbyHogs t1_jebacfk wrote
Is it a safe assumption that the more inland areas are always more religious than coastal areas which have more diverse people and exposure to new ideas?
warpus t1_jebb79u wrote
Especially in western europe. I'd be far less surprised about a bible belt in say, Poland.
Epyr t1_jebdc9s wrote
That's also not true. The Dutch arose as an independent nation in the 1600s and share a lot of history with the low Germans. Even today groups like the Frisians have arguably more in common with Germans such as the Hanoverians than the Hanoverians have with Bavarians. They were different than other Germans but not significantly moreso than other difference within what we now call the German people.
A quick look at wikipedia also shows they came from all over Germany and parts of the Netherlands https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pennsylvania_Dutch
ST616 t1_jebgd31 wrote
The percentage of American voters and lawmakers who were against Roe v. Wade has always been a lot larger than the percentage of Dutch voters and lawmakers who are sympathetic to the aims of the SGP.
Ok-Sweetums t1_jebgqb5 wrote
It's a really wide belt there.
TheDetailNerd t1_jebhpk9 wrote
Are they as hate filled and bigoted as the us Bible belt?
arcosapphire t1_jebht7t wrote
Well it sure is good that percentages of support never change over time, then.
warpus t1_jebie9z wrote
Bible pants
DaNo1CheeseEata t1_jebjekr wrote
>nd unlike the US, where religious belief is holding steady,
Meanwhile in reality.
>A new report by Pew Research Center and the General Social Survey published on Tuesday found that the large numbers of people in the U.S who practice Christianity are declining. The religion's demographic has been dwindling since the 1990s, the report said, as many adults transition to an identity of atheist, agnostic or "nothing in particular
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/christianity-us-shrinking-pew-research/
DaNo1CheeseEata t1_jebjllt wrote
Wait to you hear about blasphemy laws in Europe.
https://www.economist.com/erasmus/2017/08/13/ranking-countries-by-their-blasphemy-laws
And don't forget state churches and tons of state banned films and books.
Away-Bee-616 t1_jebren1 wrote
Perhaps but not as much as this comment section.
LosWitchos t1_jebuuhi wrote
Despite what you say, there is an area (around the south east of the country) that's considered the bible belt of Poland.
It's partly because in most big cities, dropping religion is a growing trend, but that area of Poland doesn't have big cities, rather smaller cities, towns and villages. They're more likely to base their community around the church.
InsatiableWand3rlust t1_jec518r wrote
Interesting idea. Makes sense because coasts are where immigrants and foreign nationals first come to when they travel to the given country. This seems pretty spot-on. Or maybe it's because cities in general are developed alongside water bodies, and some of these are on oceanic coasts, and cities are more diverse in general, making them more liberal.
Some inland areas are more liberal than coastal cities, though (Paris is probably more liberal than a small Mediterranean city on its southern coast).
im4ruckus t1_jecg7sm wrote
I grew up in the Christian Reformed Church in Michigan and never knew this about this in the Netherlands. CRC had remained a pretty conservative organization. Lots of cities in Michigan around Holland Michigan have Netherland names, like Zeeland!!
nomagneticmonopoles t1_jechaz9 wrote
Actually they're mostly originally Swiss, but yes, the word morphed with regard to the language they spoke.
TouristNo4039 t1_jecj4ho wrote
https://sgp.nl/standpunten/theocratie
They don't even hide it.
TigerDragon747 t1_jeckakx wrote
India actually calls their’s the cow belt
ST616 t1_jecmeqk wrote
They change but not by that much. The percentage of Americans who support abortion rights hasn't changed much for decades, nor has the percentage of Dutch people who support the SGP.
pohl t1_jecoubz wrote
They gotta zoom that map out a bit so you can see the end of the belt in W Michigan.
Away-Bee-616 t1_jecquk6 wrote
I'm a Christian and a patriot (patriot = nationalist for my purposes) but I do not like the idea of theocracy nor do I like modern examples of theocracy (Middle East countries including Israel, the Vatican, North Korea...) I know that separation of church and state is more of an unspoken rule in the USA but it's a good rule. Please tell me if I'm misunderstanding you but are you advocating for a christian theocracy? If so I'm not buying.
_Mechaloth_ t1_jectssi wrote
Former United Reformed Churchee here (now agnostic). You guys were way too lax for the true TULIPers.
_Mechaloth_ t1_jectv4e wrote
I think it’s the cowbell.
Barbarossa7070 t1_jecwf2x wrote
Like a wrestling belt.
ThatDarnedAntiChrist t1_jedb6i3 wrote
Number one, the separation of church and state isn't an idea, it's the first line in the First amendment.
Number two: the article I posted the link was warning about Christian nationalists. I'm not advocating for a Christian theocracy, I'm concerned people too stupid for their own good think we can have one here. I'm all for a secular government and the free practice of one's faith. God has no business in government, and government has no business in religion, as long as that religion doesn't deprive anyone of their rights.
Kargathia t1_jedbzbc wrote
If there's such a correlation, it's more likely to be indirect, with large urban areas being less religious, and the same large urban areas being likely to be sited next to a river or coast.
As a direct example, the province of Zeeland is often considered to be part of the Dutch bible belt, and it doesn't get much more coastal than that. It does lack a major city.
Away-Bee-616 t1_jedcxup wrote
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
In Everson v. Board of Education (1947), the Court drew on Thomas Jefferson's correspondence to call for "a wall of separation between church and State", though the precise boundary of this separation remains in dispute and the terms "church" and "State" do not appear in the Amendment.
Also I couldn't open the link. My phone's fucky I'm getting it fixed soon. The first amendment just says the federal govt cannot make any religion a state religion. This implies a separation of church and state and for all intents and purposes that's what it means but for instance law makers can still use their papist or Mohammedan values when writing or voting for a law.
ThatDarnedAntiChrist t1_jedhbdi wrote
>but for instance law makers can still use their papist or Mohammedan values when writing or voting for a law.
Most likely Baptist, Presbyterian, or Evangelical values. Just remember most domestic terrorists identify as protestant evangelicals. And it's Islamic, not Mohammedan. Unless you somehow gravitate towards the early 20th century.
I would expect any person to be guided by their values, be them religious or not. It's when they expect their religious dogma to become part of law that's an issue.
Johannes_P t1_jee2ipl wrote
And if you want to bring your children there then think about vaccinating them, since the locals, as hardcore Calvinists, think vaccination gfoes against divine predestination.
WanderingLethe t1_jegwnbm wrote
Deutsch didn't get morphed into Dutch.
It are words with the same origin, meaning of the people, the word people actually has the same origin as well.
Germanic people referred to themselves as Diets/Duutsch/Deutsch and some more variants.
The English mostly had contact with the Dutch, and called them Dutch, while the Dutch eventually started to call themselves Nederlands(Netherlandic) and only the Germans Duits. The Dutch anthem uses Duijtsche bloet, now Duitsen bloed (Dutch blood).
The Germans have kept the word Deutsch for their own, just as the Pennsylvanian Dutch (Deutsch).
Badmeestert t1_je9tkuw wrote
Yes and they belt away
So many children we will get overthrown