Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

valkyrjuk t1_jd3jr01 wrote

My whole yard is coal wash from a nearby mine. Two years ago when the PNW had that really bad summer where it got to 114 degrees we had a fire start in the yard. We got it taken care of and started looking for the source. Using our excavator and some kind of a heat vision thing we dug into a really hot spot underground. Dude, the dirt in the pit we dug was fucking boiling. It's normally a thick black mud out here, but it looked like bubbling black sand. Like I was boiling ink.

I'm not sure what started it, it could have been burning for years and the drout is all that was needed to set the lawn on fire, but it was spooky man.

464

Fourney t1_jd3riwa wrote

That's insane. I can't imagine. How long had you lived there before discovering your angry dirt?

149

valkyrjuk t1_jd3s1n3 wrote

18 years! The soil itself is fairly new as far as dirt goes, as the mine was open less than 150 years ago though I don't know the exact date

117

Fourney t1_jd3sh7m wrote

Whaaaaaaat?! So fascinating! Did the snow stick in those spots over the years? Oh my gosh I have a million questions.

34

valkyrjuk t1_jd3tj9q wrote

Yeah the snow had no problem sticking, and we get so much rain the ground gets soaked a long ways down. It had to have been a very recent event, we did burn some wooden construction waste a few months prior but we'd never had a problem like this before so I'm not sure. It's quite a mystery

46

brown_booty_bandit t1_jd41rw6 wrote

Post some pics man! Would love to see it!

9

valkyrjuk t1_jd4j3fz wrote

Unfortunately I didn't get any pictures :( I was pretty occupied, but I wish I had gotten some

13

Alan_Smithee_ t1_jd60ix0 wrote

Have you looked into whether there is any sort of comeback or cleanup/compensation available from the former mine owners? This doesn’t seem right.

5

valkyrjuk t1_jd66r5i wrote

No? I mean, I live on seven acres and 4 of them have this coal wash going down like three feet. I don't think there's anything to do about it, and besides the plants seem to like it. I don't even know if the mining company is active, a logging company runs the hill now.

12

CY_Royal t1_jd5q9j4 wrote

Wonder if you could use the heat to make power somehow

2

Partly_Dave t1_jd56147 wrote

My first job was at a sawmill. They had an area for air drying timber that was previously a dump for sawdust and bark, and it was capped with a metre of fill.

One of my tasks was to take the temperature of the ground around a crack in the fill that had been smoking for ten or so years.

There was no way to put out the fire, but the concern was if it broke through, all the semi-dried timber stacked on top would go up in flames. Plus, the site backed onto the forest, so a fire would be disastrous.

41

Rtheguy t1_jd7kwtq wrote

Just how toxic is your yard? Coal wash is not exactly known as good healthy ground right?

2

valkyrjuk t1_jd89gn0 wrote

No clue! The plants like it, the grass grows very sugary and none of our animals have like cancer or anything. In fact they usually live their full lifespans, all our dogs get to be ancient and our cats get old as balls too. The horses like the grass so much they get fat and the elk make a point of eating up the yard. All things considered it doesn't seem very toxic!

2

oceanduciel t1_jd5sjrm wrote

In the Pacific Northwest?

0

T_Noctambulist t1_jd6458h wrote

We have rainforests and deserts; Ski mountains and hot springs; Volcanoes and cedar groves. Don't judge us by Portland and Seattle.

10

Saltmetoast t1_jd62vdh wrote

Half of Oregon looks like Arizona. It has scorpions and snakes

7

oceanduciel t1_jd64uai wrote

Didn’t know the first part but snakes aren’t exclusive to desert climates.

2

Saltmetoast t1_jd6eo41 wrote

Generally they aren't a fan of damp though, unless sea snakes. Should have seen my face when we found a scorpion though, colour me surprised!

https://smithrock.com

Also I recommend the movie even cowgirls get the blues not as good the book obvs but the rock makes an appearance

−2

Rich-Juice2517 t1_jd5tu89 wrote

Yes. That's where Oregon is

I'm not sure what you're surprised at

1

oceanduciel t1_jd5vlun wrote

Just for that level of dryness to be present in that region. Since it’s a temperate rainforest and everything.

0

youtocin t1_jd69t4z wrote

Look at a satellite map of Oregon. Most of the green is concentrated in the Cascadian range of the west. It's mostly desert as you go east.

5

Rich-Juice2517 t1_jd5w6nj wrote

Ah yeah, the rainforest is only in the Olympic peninsula from what I've seen. It gets wet a lot there

Edit: to add we've been at like 80% of our regular water table and in a drought the last few years

2

KittenPics t1_jd5zgm6 wrote

Yeah, that’s what everyone thinks, that it rains every day. I assure you, it does not.

2

McRaige t1_jd7214w wrote

We do not get enough average annual rain in most parts of Oregon to be a temperate rainforest by about 10 inches. And even without that, the wooded, foresty areas that everyone thinks of when thinking of oregon are on the northwestern coastal areas. The rest of the state is varying states of grasslands and dessert, and while less poplated, is the larger portion of the state by far.

2

Landlubber77 t1_jd2lzmg wrote

Billy Joel was brought in for questioning but continues to deny involvement, authorities say.

413

tossinthisshit1 t1_jd4hgme wrote

31

Landlubber77 t1_jd4qa41 wrote

Fantastic guide.

When I was a kid I used to think the line "trouble in the Suez!" was "trouble in the sewers!" because I was a child and didn't know what the Suez was. Around the same exact time, I walked out into the living room while my mom was watching IT and it was the part where Pennywise was trying to lure Georgie down into the sewer. So I spent an unreasonable amount of time in 1990-'91 thinking there was some epidemic of child-murderers lurking in the sewers.

34

JRSOne- t1_jd5m0um wrote

Haha. Similarly my first musical memory was at 3 or 4 years old and it's sitting in the back of my mom's car thinking BJ is singing "Harmonicaaa harmonicaaa."

The tune made sense in my preschool head. :-)

3

KypDurron t1_jd7ix8j wrote

Wait, which song did you think that was part of?

1

MuthaPlucka t1_jd34m7t wrote

Ask a tween how old a boomer is…

25

Landlubber77 t1_jd35qrs wrote

Ask a twink how moldy my bloomers are.

53

mdude7221 t1_jd554t2 wrote

How is it possible that you have 2 million comment karma?

0

Landlubber77 t1_jd59kd2 wrote

The same way you get to Carnegie Hall.

Mapquest.

7

ApologizingCanadian t1_jd5ifju wrote

But what about Carnegie Mellon?

2

Landlubber77 t1_jd5jlag wrote

Their acceptance rate is about 14%, same as my Reddit comments. You don't get to 2 million karma without taking countless thousands of downvotes.

8

hazeleyedwolff t1_jd5d4z3 wrote

Quantity over quality.

0

Landlubber77 t1_jd5n7o0 wrote

Quality is an oddly subjective thing. The vast majority of my most-upvoted shit is just sorta meh, whereas there are some absolute gems out there that land with a resounding thud and die with three upvotes. I click save on them all the same so I can go back and giggle when I'm bored and/or sad Landlubber.

5

mdude7221 t1_jd5t5kv wrote

Sooo quantity then?

1

Landlubber77 t1_jd5xodu wrote

Depends on who you ask I guess. I encourage anyone to get out there and try to throw endless comments out and see if it gets you to 2 million. There's some dude out there with like 20-something million comment karma, he's probably the one to ask. I used to be 50th on Earth, now I'm barely scraping top-100. I got banned from my main karma sub six years ago, now I just grab a bit here and there.

5

G7ZR1 t1_jd60tsk wrote

Amazing use of your free time. I wish I had such low standards. I’m rich, but sad. I envy your meaningless karma.

−2

Landlubber77 t1_jd61c8k wrote

Oh I suspect you're mocking me. Here's a shiny. Cheer up.

7

G7ZR1 t1_jd6sxy3 wrote

Actually, I was just being a clown. It wasn’t a serious comment.

2

uarenotschmoo t1_jd2mc0o wrote

He didn't start the fire!

9

Clanstantine t1_jd2yczf wrote

It's reported that his comment on it was "it was always burning, since the world's been turning."

29

BlainInBama t1_jd2koze wrote

Everything in Australia wants to kill you. Even the ground.

130

TheFightingImp t1_jd3orfn wrote

This episode of Bluey is called "Coal Fires".

Bluey-fied picture of a lump of coal...on fire.

11

_Silly_Wizard_ t1_jd2rp5b wrote

However, as hot air rises, the burning ground in Australia is perfectly safe.

3

Hewn-U t1_jd6xv0o wrote

So you’re saying It’s above the environment?

1

Nazamroth t1_jd2t308 wrote

There is one thing that is not doing that: Volcanoes.

0

Charlotte_D_Katakuri t1_jd2km3x wrote

> The site's name is Mount Wingen but is commonly called Burning Mountain

Nobody knows how it earned the nickname.

94

feor1300 t1_jd5t4o3 wrote

>The Aborigines named the mountain Wingen, which means 'fire'.

I'd say they asked the locals but this is probably more of a "great minds think alike" situation. lol

10

danteheehaw t1_jd5lv51 wrote

Actually got the nick name because that's where they used to 420 blaze it

7

ledow t1_jd3x5va wrote

I get not putting it out (hugely impractical scale), but it's weird that nobody's found a way to monetise it.

Free heat enough to scorch the earth and nobody's come up with a way to make electricity from it?

35

chriswaco t1_jd363gz wrote

Has anybody considered that this might be the gateway to Hell?

14

crispy1978 t1_jd2hryo wrote

With all the environmental things going on, why not put it out?

9

tbaxattack t1_jd2uq8r wrote

There's something similar going on in the abandoned town of Centralia, Pennsylvania. In the 60s or something the coal mine underneath the town caught on fire, has been on fire since then and everyone moved out. I'm assuming it's impossible to put the fire out.

79

Bostonlbi t1_jd3n603 wrote

There’s some long running fires underground along the Colorado Front Range too. They were cited as a possible source for a wild grassland fire that burnt down almost a thousand homes at the end of 2021.

24

malivon t1_jd57kjn wrote

A lot of coal is burning too, in Montana. If there’s coal, there’s a chance it can catch fire.

3

drdiemz t1_jd3ylaa wrote

All those fire are started by dumbasses who move here thinking theyre fucking les stroud and make a mess of the place

−31

P15U92N7K19 t1_jd5a1xr wrote

They used an old pit mine as a dump. Then they set the dump on fire. Fire spread to the coal seam underground.

6

milo159 t1_jd3a31z wrote

Because putting out a fire that rages through a million tiny cracks in the ground requires that you find ALL of those tiny cracks. This is not something science has an answer to yet.

26

GDMFusername t1_jd3eb4u wrote

Ok I got it, fracking but with... Foam.
1 Government contract pls.

23

milo159 t1_jd3exlw wrote

Foam? Why not seawater? No shortage of salt water any time soon.

13

BoxingSoup t1_jd3scze wrote

Because salting the earth is almost as bad as a low, slow fire

21

zachzsg t1_jd4f7ak wrote

That’s why you get a contract to get rid of the salt water you used to get rid of the fire

11

feor1300 t1_jd5tda2 wrote

It's Australia, when they're done they can just tow the saltwater out of the environment.

1

milo159 t1_jd3spka wrote

Oh yeah, i forgot about that. Well eityer way fracking wouldn't work because it covers too small an area.

2

milo159 t1_jd3g16m wrote

Also fracking is pretty short-ranged as i understand it, damn inverse square law. If it were that small we could just comb the whole thing with enough people, the problem is that its a lot bigger than that.

2

DeNir8 t1_jd3dgkf wrote

It could be excavated in advance? Travels at 1m/year. Begin 50 meters down the road..

−1

milo159 t1_jd3e3vv wrote

Its a vein of coal in the earth, its not gonna expand beyond the bounds of the coal, its just that short of excavating the ENTIRE thing theres no way to make it stop, and making a pit that big costs a lot of money. That much funding would frankly do more good elsewhere.

18

DeNir8 t1_jd3potx wrote

Coal is being dug in mines for profit all over. How deep is this burn? It has air. It scorches the earth..

−3

milo159 t1_jd3r40y wrote

I imagine it would also be incredibly dangerous to even attempt, you're exposing coal thats been burning off of a tiny stream of o2 for ages, to a ton of air all at once.

12

DeNir8 t1_jd40pv3 wrote

True. But then there is no coal. Removing the fuel would make it stop burning.

−1

maartenvanheek t1_jd3yfer wrote

Coal being dug for profit depends on many things. Ease of access, both in the mining sense (how easy is it to dig a mine, and how safe is the soil around it to prevent subsidence) and the distance to where it is needed. In a remote area, transportation costs might soon exceed mining profits even if it's high grade coal.

2

DeNir8 t1_jd413av wrote

Tbt. I imagine someone would have done it if there was profit to be made. It may drive a sick kind of tourism? I donno. But stopped it can be. Probably not worth it.

1

whatproblems t1_jd38olx wrote

i mean you’d probably have to redirect a river into it to stop it

24

iCameToLearnSomeCode t1_jd5cdy0 wrote

I don't think that would do it.

It's clearly got its own oxygen source down there and open spaces that aren't braced frequently collapse protecting the front edge of the fire from the burned sections and the unburned sections aren't that permeable to water.

5

MrStayPuftSeesYou t1_jd2qm8f wrote

It would cost way way way too much. Even then probably impossible. We don't control nature.

12

Vlacas12 t1_jd2i55x wrote

Maybe, because it has nothing to do at all with anthropogenic climate change?

5

ZhouDa t1_jd2z6sj wrote

According to the Aborigines it is anthropocentric though...

5

I_am_Hecarim t1_jd2xze3 wrote

I’m assuming the downvotes are from people scared of the word anthropogenic

4

Prinzka t1_jd3ypv6 wrote

It still contributes to the same issues, even if it's not caused by humans.
The vast amounts of resources needed to even try to put this out probably far outweigh the benefits.
But i don't think it's accurate to say that just because it's not human made it can't haem us.

2

Vlacas12 t1_jd426lh wrote

What I am saying is, that it is totally irrelevant to current climate change. It doesn't "contribute to the same issues", because natural sources just don't have the same, critical effect, even if you take all of them combined, as anthropogenic climate change.

0

Prinzka t1_jd463u7 wrote

Dunno what to say to this. That's simply not true.
You can't say that human coal burning contributes to our climate change but coal burning that we didn't cause doesn't contribute.

3

shalafi71 t1_jd4otm9 wrote

What /u/Vlacas12 means is this; There are $X tons of CO2 released naturally. There are $Y tons of CO2 released due to human activity.

$X isn't such a big deal, taken apart from $Y, because nature recycles it. Add in $Y, which is more than nature can make use of, that's a big deal.

Does that makes sense? OP is breaking it down, you're taking a total approach. One can't say either view is wrong.

2

slower-is-faster t1_jd5ba1s wrote

1m per year, sounds dumb but can’t we just dig a fire break like we do in the tree lines

6

feor1300 t1_jd5tydc wrote

We probably could but the practicality of it would depend on how deep and wide the vein is. If it's 100m deep and 50m wide it's probably too expensive to dig a suitable trench out to completely cut off the vein. Also, it wouldn't stop the fire, it would just prevent it from spreading any further.

11

ImmoralJester54 t1_jd7cdlt wrote

They COULD do that to save the environment. OR say fuck it and ignore it.

1

FrightenedOfSpoons t1_jd4lorx wrote

I remember going there quite some years ago, you could see the path the fire had taken, where the trees had died and the ground had subsided.

4

Paperdiego t1_jd4nghy wrote

How does a fire burn underground? Wouldn't lack of oxygen put it out?

2

VisualImportance5837 t1_jd4toh3 wrote

Cracks and crevices in the ground allow air in. Not very much air - the coal is just barely alight, just barely smouldering, like charcoal and a barbeque.

Normally, coal would go out with so little air. However, it's trapped deep underground and the heat can't escape. So, even just smouldering, with the heat being trapped, will keep the fire alight.

10

RUFukd2 t1_jd54mvw wrote

Sounds super efficient, do you think this coal thing has legs? I'm sure there are no drawbacks.

2

hyperbolicorange t1_jd6fgof wrote

My ex-bf once tried to convince me that the “eternal flame” was burning because of Jesus

2

nmchild t1_jd4iqmp wrote

Fire, fire on the mountain.

1

FrostyBallBag t1_jd59t2e wrote

Australia never ceases to be more terrifying to me.

1

Jesusisajedi t1_jd5oc6x wrote

Grateful Dead wrote a whole song about it

1

Vex_Appeal t1_jd3tauc wrote

Oi why don't they just put water on it. Problem?

0

oceanduciel t1_jd5symz wrote

Because it’ll turn into steam?

2

Vex_Appeal t1_jd671ts wrote

Catch the steam with a tarp, it condenses and falls back down. Boom you got yourself a self sustaining fire putter outer.

1

oceanduciel t1_jd67ndm wrote

I’m not an engineer or scientist so I can’t say whether that would work or not.

0

Vex_Appeal t1_jd6mt7l wrote

You know damn well it'd work, don't steal my idea

2

86bluemk2 t1_jd6mpkd wrote

Usually takes a crane to put them out..

0

TuSolidx t1_jd57ggg wrote

I'll add one more wHy DoNt ThEy JuSt PuT iT oUt to this thread and then my shitty idea that wouldn't work/is impossible followed by waxing poetic about how passionate I am about climate change and then finally put a bow on the whole thing by making an incredibly forced Australia upside down joke.

−1

paladinchiro t1_jd3pk76 wrote

I'd recommend sending in an army of Russian 5th graders to put out the fire but they will probably be sent to the front lines in Ukraine here pretty soon =(

−2

philfix t1_jd4l7bi wrote

<Serious> How can coal burn underground with no oxygen source?

−2

cunninglinguist6 t1_jd4rjee wrote

Thats why its burning for so long its just smoldering if its good material even a small bit can smolder for very long time look up amadou tinder fungus.

7

Evan-Gogh t1_jd4xm61 wrote

Why don't they put it out with a kame hame ha blast?

−4

floridawhiteguy t1_jd3qbr3 wrote

At last: We've identified the source of global warming climate change!

−5

LolaBijou84 t1_jd5tzx8 wrote

Fuck… American here. 1m a year?? Which M?? Mile? Meter? Milli something 😂??!

−7

Grpc96 t1_jd615ef wrote

Meters.

3

LolaBijou84 t1_jd61g2u wrote

I think I thought that but was really more interested in being lazy and wanting to not google how much a meter is in comparison to feet. I know it’s bitchy. It’s enough that I know 3 feet is one yard!

−3

Chababa93 t1_jd3dwa9 wrote

Did this thousand-years fire punch a hole in Earth's fart shield?

−12

SomeplaceManitoba t1_jd39y1b wrote

The local explanation is so blunt, a man fell down a sinkhole. He lit a torch and incinerated himself. No magic sky birds, just a poor unfortunate who warns us to this day of his folly.

−25

Elite_Jackalope t1_jd3b1hl wrote

Did you, like, intentionally read around the stuff you didn’t like?

Not everything, especially concerning ancient human societies, has to boil down to “religion bad.” Until fairly recently (in the grand scheme of our existence) religion and the supernatural was how all people alive understood the world.

> The Aborigines named the mountain Wingen, which means 'fire'. Their explanation of the origin of the burning mountain was that one day, a tribesman was lighting a fire on the mountainside when he was carried off deep into the earth by The Evil One. Unable to escape, he used his fire stick to set the mountain alight, so that the smoke might warn others to keep away.

He is literally carried into the mountain by an evil spirit and lights the mountain on fire to warn others of the spirit’s presence. The complete opposite of your understanding.

18