Comments
InfluenceDear9975 t1_jd6ulj1 wrote
Well, when Marlon Brando boycotts something, it tends to steal the show like a true Godfather.
[deleted] t1_jd6xgty wrote
[deleted]
kudichangedlives t1_jd6z5vt wrote
Classic mob movie, the first part of 3, I'm sure you'd recognize the title
VengefulMight OP t1_jd6z8aa wrote
Both for The Godfather. Brando won but refused to accept the award and sent someone to lecture the audience about Native Americans instead.
VengefulMight OP t1_jd6z9jk wrote
Only the first two of those films need be acknowledged.
ebikr t1_jd6zb4n wrote
Shame they couldn’t be more mature about it like a couple of good fellas.
kudichangedlives t1_jd6zh7u wrote
Ya, only Goodfellas and Scarface exist, not the Irishman
MarcusXL t1_jd6zx8q wrote
There was no part 3.
This is how we are remembering it.
RUNdoneDIDit t1_jd71zvs wrote
Does it not go by whoever gets top billing. Whoever is top on the list is the main actor and anyone underneath is supporting?
[deleted] t1_jd725zn wrote
[deleted]
ST616 t1_jd74x8t wrote
The article mentions that in 1935 two actors were both nominated for best actor for the same film.
SpunKDH t1_jd76gvi wrote
I don't get you people with this stance. Is it a masterpiece? Maybe not but still a great movie with a solid story. Your purism is really borderline gatekeeping and totally childish
TomHanksBeachDay t1_jd77lo0 wrote
It’s alright that had a good time at the casino
theguineapigssong t1_jd782gq wrote
Why doesn't Marlon Brando, the largest Best Actor Nominee, not simply eat the others?
[deleted] t1_jd78fui wrote
[deleted]
TomHanksBeachDay t1_jd78yuy wrote
Or maybe because he’s the main character and not in a supporting role. And should Brando win over him he wants lose properly, nominated in the same category as him (the Godfather has 2 main characters . Instead of moving down to the supporting category, taking a supporting actor who deserved to win’s Oscar, taking a different actor’s nomination, and for the rest of time everyone thinking “Wow, did Pacino really move categories just to not lose to Brando and win one for himself…. what a bitch.”
TomHanksBeachDay t1_jd7901r wrote
Or maybe because he’s the main character and not in a supporting role. And should Brando win over him he wants lose properly, nominated in the same category as him (the Godfather has 2 main characters). Instead of moving down to the supporting category, taking a supporting actor who deserved to win’s Oscar, taking a different actor’s nomination, and for the rest of time everyone thinking “Wow, did Pacino really move categories just to not lose to Brando and win one for himself…. what a bitch.”
RedshirtStormtrooper t1_jd7ar64 wrote
The irony of your gatekeeping comments are the real gift of this thread. Go on and tell us more about what we should or should not enjoy, yano, in case our childish brains don't comprehend the magnificent world of Cinema.
Edit: gotdamn, they deleted their whole Reddit life
[deleted] t1_jd7b0kp wrote
[deleted] t1_jd7b6se wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jd7bb8t wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jd7bkqm wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jd7d257 wrote
[deleted]
[deleted] t1_jd7e6hc wrote
[deleted]
hotpants86 t1_jd7ijen wrote
What kind of take is this?
No he wasn't. It's not about winning or losing, it's about being respectful and recognising him as the main star of the movie - which he was.
Salmol1na t1_jd7iktf wrote
r/iamthemaincharacter
bobcat7781 t1_jd7o1yo wrote
Al, the movie wasn't called "The Godfather's Son".
Travillick t1_jd7o4pa wrote
It is true what they say, men are from omicron persei 7, women are from omicron persei 9.
hobbitdude13 t1_jd7oz0r wrote
Abbot and Costello Meet The Son of the Bride of the Godfather Part II
iamtheju t1_jd7p5jb wrote
You nominate for the Oscar you think you can win. It happens all the time. It's understandable that he wanted the bigger nomination but the other poster is correct that he had no chance against Brando.
TeamWonderful7670 t1_jd7uuy9 wrote
Im not sure he didnt at the end there
TeamWonderful7670 t1_jd7uy3s wrote
At least Brando did it for good reason.
[deleted] t1_jd7yxro wrote
That’s a weird picture of Al Pacino.
klsi832 t1_jd7zswh wrote
TunaOnWytNoCrust t1_jd85c1j wrote
Like when a boycotted being skinny?
elvis_depressedly8 t1_jd87pwe wrote
But the whole movie literally is about Michael becoming The Godfather. They won’t even take the wedding picture until he’s there, that’s how important Michael is. When the family needs someone to step up, it’s almost always Michael. So much so that he has to flee to Sicily for a huge chunk of time.
Marlon Brando isn’t the main character. He was just the biggest name associated with the movie at the time.
ty_kanye_vcool t1_jd888uj wrote
Sayeed Al-Pashinou
Top_asfuck t1_jd89pff wrote
0 or 10, no inbetween. Bafoons.
clonetrooper250 t1_jd8as88 wrote
Exactly this, "The Godfather" refers to Michael, not Vito.
ipauljr44 t1_jd8asez wrote
Brando meanwhile boycotted the Academy Awards to protest Hollywood’s treatment of Native Americans. I wonder who is the bigger man.
shivermetimbers68 t1_jd8d0cp wrote
I would have switched it. Actually, I would have given the supporting award to James Caan. He was the pulse of the movie until...
JustAnotherActuary t1_jd8f2ar wrote
Best supporting boycotter
jemmylegs t1_jd8hq86 wrote
Do you want to include the name of the movie somewhere…?
[deleted] t1_jd8i203 wrote
[deleted]
patbb333 t1_jd8in4j wrote
In 77 two actors were also nominated for best actor in Network
RedAss2005 t1_jd8le8n wrote
When mom says "We have Al Pacino at home"
template009 t1_jd8megj wrote
And then Brando sent a Mexican women to refuse the award on behalf of Native people.
Limp_Distribution t1_jd8qsur wrote
Salah Zulfikar
mnstorm t1_jd8r76f wrote
We also know this because they made one more movie after this, The Godfather Part II.
kingoftheplebsIII t1_jd8sl4g wrote
According to Google, Pacino 5'6" Brando 5'9" so Brando is in fact the bigger man.
clonetrooper250 t1_jd8sniv wrote
Come to think of it, I feel like DeNiro's Vito gets more screentime in Part II than Brando's Vito in part I, although I haven't compared the two myself.
freedfg t1_jd8wgqf wrote
I mean. I'd be royally pissed too.
He is the main character. The protagonist.
The movie is ABOUT Michael.
Supporting actor I guess idk.
AbsolutelySloshed t1_jd8xbsi wrote
With a woman who wasn’t even Native American
Remote-District-9255 t1_jd8xc8k wrote
Title character, brah. *I was thinking the baptism was in GF2 but I guess it was at the end of 1
Remote-District-9255 t1_jd8xsf3 wrote
The godfather = Brando, the godfather 2 = Pacino, godfather 3 =
Rebloodican t1_jd8y0b1 wrote
Judas and the Black Messiah nominated their two lead actors in the Best Supporting Actor category. Movie producers are ultimately the ones who make the call (and will slot their actors/actresses strategically to maximize the awards they can get).
Capitain_Collateral t1_jd8y92j wrote
Al Pacino - Best supporting boycott
DvlsAdvct108 t1_jd8ytgk wrote
He boycotted his own photo
DvlsAdvct108 t1_jd8zc76 wrote
"I made him an offer he can't refuse..now, who's on first?"
No-Transition4060 t1_jd8zkoa wrote
Didn’t Amadeus have the same thing? F Murray Abraham actually got the Oscar but his Co-Star was going nominated for the same award I think?
Indymizzum t1_jd8zl8s wrote
She was American. She claimed to be of Native American descent, but her sisters refuted that after her death.
medievalonyou t1_jd8zxpq wrote
What's that got to do with anything?
RoPr-Crusader t1_jd900yu wrote
....he was the main character
TarkusLV t1_jd90rwy wrote
3 = Sofia Coppola
Technical_Ear_7040 t1_jd928uu wrote
1 is Michael, 2 is Vito, 3 is Vincent
template009 t1_jd92g85 wrote
Exactly.
sabersquirl t1_jd92psm wrote
Tell me you haven’t been on reddit for very long without telling me. If you didn’t know, Reddit often pulls the first image from a page for the thumbnail. So if I were a betting man, I would have to guess the article isn’t specifically about Al Pacino.
SplendidPunkinButter t1_jd936dw wrote
Oh like boycotting the Academy Awards hurts someone. Pacino didn’t like what they did, so he didn’t go to a dumb awards show. That’s not a tantrum.
ipauljr44 t1_jd946fj wrote
That’s fair
SgtSharki t1_jd948wv wrote
Pacino lost Best Supporting Actor to Joel Grey for his performance as the MC in "Cabaret", so I doubt most people even remember this happened.
ocmaddog t1_jd94i12 wrote
I’m still mad as hell about that
patbb333 t1_jd96izz wrote
Yeah I'm not gonna take it anymore
coredump3d t1_jd96snp wrote
The Godfather referred is Michael Corleone. This is his story - of transformation from an unassuming boy young man to the ruthless head of the Corleone crime family
RubendeBursa t1_jd98qo8 wrote
Samiel_Fronsac t1_jd9b32t wrote
>of transformation from an unassuming boy college dropout turned us marine war hero to the ruthless head of the Corleone crime family
Just a little correction. Carry on.
coredump3d t1_jd9b8ql wrote
Thank you for filling in some more details
Samiel_Fronsac t1_jd9bg0t wrote
It's TIL. We have to share the knowledge!
DirtySingh t1_jd9bl16 wrote
Wow, you could have said the same without being a condescending tool.
ricottapie t1_jd9cazl wrote
From the 1979 interview, as cited on Wiki: >Before Serpico, you were up for Best Supporting Actor for The Godfather. Do you feel you were in the wrong category?
>Pacino: Oh, sure. Definitely. That was outrageous. It's things like that that get you a little sour. I decided to pass the ceremonies by. There were certain people around me who wanted to write a letter, who wanted me to announce that I would not accept the nomination. I would always say, "Let it go. Let it go. Don't make waves." But then, even though I didn't go, I watched it on TV. I felt bad. I didn't care for that kind of contradiction.
Sounds like he was encouraged to boycott it but didn't follow through on an official level. He just didn't show up. That could be taken as a statement in itself, but he wasn't one for public appearances or doing a lot of press, so it probably didn't even register with those not in the know as a rebuff. And then he felt bad, haha.
Edited to close the quotation marks
ninjas_in_my_pants t1_jd9f3f7 wrote
The Godfatherer.
ninjas_in_my_pants t1_jd9fa5u wrote
Cruising.
AngelSucked t1_jd9fbui wrote
Interesting -- I've always considered "The Godfather" to either mean Michael, or maybe Michael and Vito. It is Don Michael's origin story.
material_mailbox t1_jd9h5ye wrote
The Godfather
stinking_badgers t1_jd9ip4x wrote
I really want to tease you about how if you’re expecting redditors to not be condescending tools you haven’t been on Reddit very long, but I’m afraid you’ll get mad at me.
Shishakli t1_jd9n2vk wrote
Expecting people to do the wrong thing does not excuse people from doing the wrong thing
gortexcondom t1_jd9oblb wrote
You do realize people from Mexico can be indigenous too? It’s Native American, not native United States. America is more than one continent and it’s not like the indigenous people even used our same borders anyways…
space-is-big t1_jd9q8rr wrote
Who would the main character in superbad be? Seth or Evan?
[deleted] t1_jd9qcky wrote
[removed]
improveyourfuture t1_jd9qvih wrote
<slow clap begins>
series_hybrid t1_jd9uha5 wrote
I would argue that the GF was about the transformation of Michael from the straight kid that was going to become a senator, to the most cunning mob boss ever. To understand Michael, you had to show some of Vito's story, but...in my mind, Michael is definitely the protagonist.
DroolingIguana t1_jd9w2og wrote
The novel that it was based on was both Vito and Michael's origin stories, but they left the young Vito stuff out of the movie and put it in the sequel.
template009 t1_jd9wbmd wrote
Holy shit! You mean the Aztecs were real!?
She claimed her name is Sacheen Littlefeather, that she is Apache and Yaqui. Her real name is Cruz and she has not a drop of Native blood.
This would have been so easy for you to look up, it is astonishing that you decided, instead, to point out the laughably obvious.
gortexcondom t1_jd9xcoi wrote
lmao that made me laugh. I’m aware she faked being indigenous, I didn’t need to look it up. I just didn’t like the way you worded it, why mention she was Mexican? Being Mexican and native isn’t mutually exclusive… that’s all I was saying. Kinda off putting when people like you focus so much on race
mer-madi t1_jd9yc2i wrote
One of these days, Nd-Nd, Bang! Zoom! Straight to the third moon of Omicron Persei 8!
template009 t1_jd9zgjr wrote
I focus on race?
This is a gem!
Moron
gortexcondom t1_jd9zrxw wrote
Do you wonder why many other people downvoted your initial comment? Albeit true, you added nothing of substance to the conversation. I hope you realize that, it was weird of you to make this post about race.
Says a lot about you, that you’re upset over Marlon Brando protesting for Native American rights...
qwertycantread t1_jda00cu wrote
The studio wanted Edward G. Robinson instead of Brando for that role. Coppola had to fight for him.
Pluto_Rising t1_jda0poi wrote
Right? Brando was considered non- hireable, he was on a losing streak, and a total prima donna. That biopic that came out last year was a master class.
Had to fight to get Pacino cast too, as I recall. Forget atm who they wanted originally for Michael.
qwertycantread t1_jda2szp wrote
I haven’t seen that making-of movie. So it’s good?
Anx1etyD0g t1_jda3xt7 wrote
Vito Corleone (Marlon Brando) is on the cover, and on posters with the title. He is Godfather for a large amount of screen time. A significant element of the story is how large of a figure Vito is, and his shadow looms over Michael after becoming Godfather. Take into account Brando's huge career before that, and it makes sense for him to be considered the lead.
Pluto_Rising t1_jda4ed2 wrote
It's really good. Even for someone who's never seen any of the Godfather trilogy.
The Offer is about Al Ruddy, an unknown whose boss at Paramount decided could make an impossible-to-make film.
Tons of amazing trivia facts along the way that most of us were totally unaware of.
lordeddardstark t1_jdabkfv wrote
Orson Welles already ate them all
lordeddardstark t1_jdabo1c wrote
Because Marlon fucking Brando
leakyfaucet3 t1_jdadiu3 wrote
Brando is decomposing while Pacino still walks the earth, so I'm not sure you're correct.
Gooseloff t1_jdaeb69 wrote
I always hated when they do this. Specifically, they did the same shit on Lion and I always thought it was dumb.
elvis_depressedly8 t1_jdafq7j wrote
r/confidentlyincorrect
template009 t1_jdahiaj wrote
No
I hear a fly buzzing with indignation ...
Bzzz bzzz
the_killer_cannabis t1_jdake6z wrote
From a story structure standpoint, Vito is in no way shape or form the lead. This is simply industry respect and politics. Forget screen time, measuring that is pointless. Red has the most screentime in Shawshank but Andy Dufrane is very clearly the protagonist of that story. Theory wise (and in practice), the best way to identify the protagonist of a story is to see which character has the strongest desire and acts on it. Now, they doesn't necessarily make them the lead too, but in the case of Michael/The God Father it does.
The reason he was nominated for best supporting is the same reason Timothy Hutton was put up for best supporting actor in Ordinary People when he was very clearly the lead there as well.
The academy/industry has a habit of pushing an actor to supporting when nominating because they think they'll have an easier time winning that category or because they have another actor in the film they'd prefer to nominate for best actor. It's that simple.
pinkheartpiper t1_jdalkbq wrote
I'd say putting Vito Corleone on posters was an obvious marketing choice. His is an instanlty more interesting and iconic image than Michael's. Also, Brando was a big star, Pacino wasn't. I don't think it counts as who the protagonist is. It's clearly Michael.
Level3Kobold t1_jdapibx wrote
>Theory wise (and in practice), the best way to identify the protagonist of a story is to see which character has the strongest desire and acts on it.
Bilbo isn't the protagonist, Thorin is
Venturin t1_jdar1wb wrote
And he washed them down with a bottle of Paul Masson wine.
ItsGoldJerry t1_jdarj20 wrote
I think Seth because of the whole college thing. Evan seems more of a supporting role. Good question though, made me think haha.
hotpants86 t1_jdaxjq8 wrote
Dude it has nothing to do with winning.
I am a manager and I have support officers. I would be pissed off if I was taken out of the pool of other managers to be compared with for a prize or bonus or award. If someone said to me we'll put you in the support officers pool because you'll win I'd be pissed off.
I don't care if I don't win. I'd like to win but if someone has done more to earn it then so be it. What I do care about is being put forward for something less than I'm currently doing. That's insulting.
I'm not sure why you guys are so hung up about the winning thing, it's about being recognised for what you're doing/have done not about winning a prize.
Edit: looks like the other poster isn't right and agrees with me because he's deleted his comment lol
underthingy t1_jdaxqw7 wrote
Actually by that metric the ring is the protagonist.
Successful-Royal-235 t1_jdb2iwm wrote
After the critics voted Laurence Olivier Best Actor because Brando and Pacino cancelled each other out, the studio made the call that Brando is lead, and Pacino supporting.
jerebare t1_jdb2ni0 wrote
I mostly considered it from what point of the view the story is mostly being told by. Reading the hobbit the protagonist would be Bilbo, but watching the movie versions it does go to Thorin, then Gandalf, Bilbo, Legolas, etc.
Herpinheim t1_jdb320l wrote
Duel protagonists.
Level3Kobold t1_jdb36nt wrote
Intriguingly, that would mean that the count of monte cristo is not the main character of the count of monte cristo
jerebare t1_jdb3gmx wrote
Level3Kobold t1_jdb3k52 wrote
>Duel protagonists
Paul Atreides and Feyd-Rautha Harkonnen
Sad-Faithlessness377 t1_jdb4ui1 wrote
Actually by that metric Sauron is the protagonist.
Sixslinger t1_jdb53nw wrote
I read this as "A.I." and it made me do a double take while scrolling by. I... uh need sleep.
underthingy t1_jdb593k wrote
Nah, he just sits there doing nothing.
The ring actually imposes its will on the ring bearers and makes them act how it wants.
zippypaul t1_jdb699w wrote
I guess they made him an offer he COULD refuse
tifou27 t1_jdb6ayd wrote
What was the reason?
Sad-Faithlessness377 t1_jdb7c6q wrote
Oh by that logic sure. I was going by the title of the movie.
iamtheju t1_jdba01k wrote
I would bet that most of the time if they are spending the large amount not of money it costs to campaign for an Oscar nomination they would want to win.
I'm not saying it's right to be nominated in the lower prestige category than the role you played, I'm just saying it's not uncommon.
ankur16 t1_jdbho9s wrote
To support the cause for Native Indians. BTW i am indian , indian from India and i came to know this recently only about this boycott.
LisaCaserta t1_jdbrpv4 wrote
Very sad you make fun of a established award winning actor Godfather won 9 Oscars once u get best picture everyone gets the Oscar you the only difference is the cast members has to buy them last time I checked they went for 4k..you kids have no idea how hard it is to work on any film.
JorgeSeptien t1_jdbxcu6 wrote
That picture is not Al Pacino. That is Egyptian actor Salah Zulfikar.
Ok-Sprinklez t1_jdczrna wrote
But was it before it's time?
VengefulMight OP t1_jd6tc5j wrote
I would imagine that Pacino’s tantrum is little known, because it was overshadowed by Marlon Brandon’s own boycott.