[deleted] t1_j994i9k wrote
momolamomo t1_j99ck0s wrote
Except there were feral cats back then, along with wild goats and feral camels. He only applied the condition on the dog, so he’s singled them Out, healthy or not. So your argument doesn’t hold water
[deleted] t1_j99e2ti wrote
[deleted]
momolamomo t1_j99e8h8 wrote
Except old mate mohamad wasn’t talking about danger. He was saying that the animal, regardless if it’s clean or not, is not pure, spiritually. He goes on to describe that angels “refuse” to enter a home that contains a dog. Mohamad was NOT talking about danger.
He needed something unique to seperate his new religion from Other religions
[deleted] t1_j99f64v wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments