[deleted]
Comments
Ramii83 t1_j6boy9v wrote
It wasn’t your video unless the original porn was a snuff film or child porn. She created music for a different porn movie that you also credited, and I can’t see someone saying “you released music for one porno and that was fine, but then we found a second one and that is just one porno too many.”
kage11217 t1_j6bp11l wrote
The Sounds Of Porn: Just the Dude Grunts
KcocNoisnetxeGib t1_j6bsjjz wrote
Right?!? And I read this twice for the sheer “how the fuck does one get a job like that?“ factor. Lol
[deleted] OP t1_j6bsu3j wrote
[deleted]
noahB53 t1_j6buz8d wrote
Huh?
thirdeyefish t1_j6bv4gr wrote
Pornosonic has entered the chat
punx_a_hippie t1_j6bz7oj wrote
What's your channel I need to find the porn music
[deleted] OP t1_j6bzoro wrote
[removed]
TJinAZ t1_j6c0kym wrote
Well, if he’s not out there doing it, the porn diddies will never be released and the artists will not be properly recognized for their efforts to enhance our viewership experience.
If not him, then who? If not now, then when?
MethanyJones t1_j6c0m3f wrote
Mhm, they do a cover of "Stacy's Mom" called "Stacee's Mom." The verse about the smoke rings gets me every time
Specific_Tap7296 t1_j6c3aeu wrote
I've seen every possible porn related TIFU... Wait, what? There's music at the end?
Yisuscrais69 t1_j6c3b6x wrote
It al starts with someone asking you “what are you willing to do” when you’re facing homelessness and/or starvation right on their ugly mugs for one to just calmly start ignoring the weirdness out of whatever gig comes their way.
WeNeedToTalkAboutMe t1_j6caizl wrote
I once got threatened with a lawsuit because a fanfic I wrote had someone's name in it.
Seriously.
Well, 'seriously' as in "I received an email from what I found out through my research was a legitimate law firm", but I doubt I would have gotten sued. Apparently, this person had an uncommon name (which I had coincidentally just thought up) and the site that hosted my stories was popular enough that my fic showed up on the first page of the Google search, so they were concerned about someone seeing that (the character was a criminal in my story).
So I had to hurriedly write to the host and notifiy them, along with sending an edited version of the story with a different name. That one didn't get noticed, apparently.
vrenak t1_j6ccw46 wrote
Sounds like an agent to avoid frankly.
TheOtherDutchGuy t1_j6cdcky wrote
This puritanism in the US is really annoying…
AurumArgenteus t1_j6cfel5 wrote
Sadly, this is true. It's insane we treat food, medicine, and housing as privileges so corporations can coerce us into worse working conditions.
1000Hells1GiftShop t1_j6ctc83 wrote
>she has a whole album about having sex with aliens.
I'm going to need the name of that album.
[deleted] OP t1_j6cvvx7 wrote
[removed]
nofriendsnolife93 t1_j6cwkuo wrote
What's the alien sex album? I kinda wanna hear that
Bike_Chain_96 t1_j6cyn2x wrote
She should stick to the porn music. My coworker made fucking bank off of that. He does security now so that he's not bored
Individual-Seat-9021 t1_j6d09tq wrote
So, what’s your YouTube channel?
piotrrasputin344 t1_j6d0m1p wrote
I mean, tbf, most people don't make it to the end.
AwayJacket4714 t1_j6d3obs wrote
I mean, their concern is not completely unwarranted.
Yes we know, a smart person googling their name and getting to your fic would easily figure out they are not related, but tbh the average person is not that smart. Plus, employers who look up peoples' names online won't go deep enough to clear any misunderstanding. They will just look at the first result and see it's something they consider inappropriate, and whoosh, there goes your interview. Especially if their name is so uncommon they have trouble to convice people it's just a coincidence.
ringobob t1_j6d8meh wrote
It's possible the agent only found the one, and might have also found the other if this mistaken one hadn't existed, or perhaps they would have never found the other one.
I don't think it's OP's fault this person lost the book deal - porn is hardly a disqualifying topic in media, unless it was religious in nature or, like, children's books. The agent should be doing their due diligence, both to verify that this was an incorrect attribution, and that the other attribution exists and is correct. That they didn't do any of that tells me this was not something super important to the agent.
WeNeedToTalkAboutMe t1_j6daugz wrote
Yeah, it was, IIRC, the sixth result, so obviously that was a problem, unintentional though it was.
Lumpy-Dingo-947 t1_j6dbyzb wrote
The resume bot might get confused.
RiddledWithEnigma t1_j6dc32o wrote
<people who watch porn for le sexy time>
<people who watch porn for the plot>
OP: I watch porn to preserve the history of music.
[deleted] OP t1_j6dce2m wrote
[deleted]
SpaceAgePotatoCakes t1_j6dmldw wrote
My guess is that maybe there was no book deal, but the singer who contacted OP didn't want to be credited for the other singers work because they don't like them for whatever reason.
Lanian55 t1_j6dzavp wrote
Maybe it's not the subject matter; maybe it was just a bad song she didnt want to be associated with?
bigdave44 t1_j6e1w6k wrote
So, uh, was this chick named Josie?
Ramii83 t1_j6e2mpz wrote
True. Possibly the incorrect movie was a more famous one and those results actually showed up, whereas the other, more obscure movie, may have not even shown up on the first few search pages and might have been missed.
ironroad18 t1_j6e67ow wrote
Op is the Ken Burns of porno.
OneMoreGirl_MX t1_j6eajur wrote
This reminds me about a song in a porn animated video, is pretty great and i haven't found the singer u.u
robbiewilso t1_j6ebc2z wrote
heres another interesting song source
puffmaster5000 t1_j6eitk6 wrote
Not your problem though
[deleted] OP t1_j6en7l4 wrote
[removed]
Impressive_Teach9188 t1_j6eo00x wrote
During the 70s 80s even some early 90s porn had music during the sex scenes. That's where the joke about something sounding like cheesy porn music came from
Another thing is most porn from before those times was nothing but music, no sex sounds, no voices, nothing but the music. Also the music back then sounded alot like elevator music and the crappy music you hear when you call a company and are placed on hold
aussie_nub t1_j6f788l wrote
It's none of these things. Why would a publisher drop a book deal because of a single credit from a video on Youtube that could easily be verified as incorrect? There's definitely something else going on.
Andrewoholic t1_j6faw6i wrote
You may want to be asking in the legal section on here, about defending yourself, in case she sues you, for loss of earnings.
Lopholegs t1_j6fcb4r wrote
I know right!? And he didn't even drop a link to the channel
vmroy1 t1_j6fd6mo wrote
My very first thought
BenThereNDunThat t1_j6fkpv3 wrote
Now THAT'S what I call porn ditties, Volume 27. Due out this spring from K Tel.
1000Hells1GiftShop t1_j6foox0 wrote
TJinAZ t1_j6fwgaf wrote
...with such classics as "Bow-Chicka-Wow-Wow!"
Daveezie t1_j6fy8pn wrote
That explains the boner I get when I call my bank
Nothing_Allowed t1_j6ga5qm wrote
What's the alien sex album called?
Fox_Hawk t1_j6gapnj wrote
I had a gig scanning photos and typing up records of an entire school over a summer break. This was back in the 90s and the school records were going digital.
The whole time the boss played Christian rock recorded live at Godstock (some sort of religious festival anyway). At ear-bleeding volume.
Man I WISH I could have had a gig researching vintage porn music.
lpbale0 t1_j6ge717 wrote
OP might have a porno of Ken Burns
Castrated_Monkey69 t1_j6gewln wrote
Tf a snuff film
ironroad18 t1_j6gj27k wrote
in Morgan Freeman voice Background music
"In 1992, two rapping kids convinced everyone to wear their pants backwards. A young Maccauly Culkin, was lost again, this time in New York. American's jazzy new president was an avid saxophone player. The home video rental market had its peak year. And Ken Burns railed two horny broads, over the side of a busted Civil War cannon..."
Confident-Medicine75 t1_j6h38du wrote
What’s this channel named?
Kcidobor t1_j6h8qex wrote
Is this Matt Gourley??
Noe_b0dy t1_j6hx709 wrote
People being killed on camera to make a movie. It's debatable if they actually exist or not.
shipwreck_pete t1_j6i8vp3 wrote
You cannot trust IMDb credits. Ask any studio legal department.
COGspartaN7 t1_j6jdmoh wrote
I'm stuck in the ATM Help me, Step-CEO!
COGspartaN7 t1_j6jdw68 wrote
At one point the grunts turn into quiet weeping
TexMeta t1_j6k3hz7 wrote
That’s weird, yeah.
[deleted] OP t1_j6k3irk wrote
[removed]
Lopholegs t1_j6k4e3h wrote
Valid point message me about it
Ghostglitch07 t1_j6l81w9 wrote
I was under the impression they didn't have to literally die, just that it was a porn film with a murder In it, fictional or not.
AcrobaticSource3 t1_j6bolv3 wrote
You have a weird side gig, sir.