Submitted by KneeHighMischief t3_10m7n46 in television
vadergeek t1_j6336dl wrote
Reply to comment by NotARandomNumber in Has any show done a series long antagonist better than Angel? by KneeHighMischief
I don't know, Dukat was messy. Felt like they couldn't quite decide if they were redeeming him, then there's all the Pah-wraith stuff that doesn't quite work.
EyeDontReplyToIdiots t1_j67u4vy wrote
I think they knew quite well what Dukat’s trajectory would be. They introduced a facet of him for a while where he felt that he could change, but ultimately his pride and ego won out. A shit leopard can’t change his spots, and thought it was an interesting arc they explored.
I somewhat agree with you in regards to the pah-wraith stuff later down the line, namely because it goes a little too heavy into the super natural for a Star Trek show.
But what helps it along I think is the death of his daughter - his lust for power over the weak bajorans (in his eyes), intersecting with his then budding religious beliefs, co-opting or appropriating it from them in a sense. It’s a perverse play on his established character thus far in the show and thought it was also a great arc for him.
Hoping that all made sense I dunno it’s 5AM and haven’t slept lol. I just like talking about Star Trek
vadergeek t1_j67yd5e wrote
> I think they knew quite well what Dukat’s trajectory would be.
I'm not sure they did. I mean, look how hard Nana Visitor had to fight against the idea of a Kira/Dukat romance.
King_Wataba t1_j6h5kpa wrote
They should have left his story with him being broken. It was a crime to not let Wynn be the conduit of the Pah-wraiths.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments