Submitted by misana123 t3_zw21e0 in television
HeavenlyCreation t1_j1tireh wrote
That’s a heck of a front photo…
Sign of a bad journalist…put a 20-40 yr old photo on and article about an 80 yr old..
I really hate bad journalists
PoshInBoost t1_j1ttius wrote
I'd say it depends if they retained their fame in later years. If by using the old photo significantly more people will recognise the person then it feels fair.
chrien t1_j1tvsqd wrote
The photo wouldn’t be sourced by the person writing the article normally.
guiltyofnothing t1_j1u0psf wrote
The person who wrote the article didn’t choose the photo.
ihopeicanforgive t1_j1uqrmg wrote
Maybe that’s how his family wanted to remember him.
And 78 is too young these days
metametapraxis t1_j1xpoz3 wrote
78 is still old, even these days. Pretty much bang on male life expectancy at birth (and only 3 years or so under life expectancy of someone who reached 25).
I've noticed people have developed weird ideas about what constitutes being old the last few years.
ihopeicanforgive t1_j1zrbve wrote
78 today is not what it used to be
[deleted] t1_j1veq9m wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments