Submitted by OfCourse4726 t3_zvstte in television
ForTheLoveOfOedon t1_j1tcg6q wrote
Reply to comment by OfCourse4726 in Borgia (2011) is better than game of thrones by OfCourse4726
I am familiar that there are two shows, one with Jeremy Irons for Showtime and one with John Doman. I have seen the Irons one in its entirety and have seen the Doman one up until season 2 (my oldest brother was super into historical dramas). However, I did assume you meant the Irons one as that is the most famous version. So apologies there! I still disagree entirely, but that clarification makes it less crazy LOL
When I said Rome and The Tudors, I was making no comment on their quality. Rather that those two are historical dramas and are thus comparable to Borgia. However my personal opinion on Rome specifically is that it is one of the great lost potentials ever. It’s a shame that show was rushed and gashed. If it could have been made with a similar pace, budget, and network support that, say, The Sopranos and The Wire had, it would likely be considered one of the golden shows of its era. Very much a shame.
OfCourse4726 OP t1_j1tevgd wrote
rome season 1 was so perfect that it was nearly impossible to surpass it. i dont know how writers for season 1 could possibly have made season 2 so bad no matter what they had to work with. you should watch borgia season 3. it might've come years after season 2 or something because i watched borgia when it came out and do not recall at all anything about season 3 when i watched it again just now. it really is incredibly good.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments