Submitted by MarvelsGrantMan136 t3_yibfe6 in television
Prax150 t1_iuiq7h5 wrote
Reply to comment by ghostgnome in ‘Stargirl’ Ending With Season 3 on The CW by MarvelsGrantMan136
What's annoying is that a big part of it is messaging and the hesitance if not straight up refusal on the part of legacy media companies to adapt. Access to broadcast TV could be simple, free and widespread with minimal effort. Already they make digital antennae you stick to a window that give you access to most broadcast networks in your area. But people just don't know about that, and many don't even know the distinction between broadcast and cable. But why not take it a step further and just make all broadcast TV free and easily accessible, officially, on the internet?
I'm guessing the answer is carriage fees from cable companies but eventually the math on that is going to change as people continue cutting the cord and then these networks are going to lament the missed opportunity for transferring that audience to digital platforms. We should have been able to watch all these channels for free years ago, I think a lot of people would have even gotten used to commercials (Netflix IMO is about to prove that), but people already don't care enough.
jemull t1_iuj6z7b wrote
I live 7 miles from Downtown in a major metropolitan area and I use a digital antenna. I get ~30 channels.
[deleted] t1_iujam8e wrote
[deleted]
Lovat69 t1_iujmidi wrote
>We should have been able to watch all these channels for free years ago,
We used to. In the aughts I could watch nbc, abc, cbs, and probably wb/cw shows online a couple of days after it aired on the channel websites. Now you can't do that without a cable key for some reason. You are right it makes no sense.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments