Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

MrBoliNica t1_itz01gf wrote

how are you behaving any better? are you judging them based on your bias? how do you know their writing is not already fine, or the storyline is not already compelling? who is pointing what fingers?

0

VampireHunterAlex t1_itz61iv wrote

Having a noted history, especially the past several years, of producing complete L’s gives me more than enough justification. They have to build that trust back up if they want to pull more people in.

0

MrBoliNica t1_itz6mf4 wrote

Whose “they”? This shows creator? Why do they need “to earn trust back”?

Are you judging them based on how they look, without taking their individual body of work into account? Don’t you see the irony, and also how problematic that is

1

VampireHunterAlex t1_itzaoyr wrote

Start reading the industry rags, pal. A recession more or less is coming down the pipeline, and everybody is going to get squeezed. Animation, due to how long it takes to produce, was only the tip of the iceberg.

It‘s called showBUSINESS for a reason, and the incredibly funny thing is: For how much you’re defending this program, I highly doubt you’re planning on even watching it.

1

MrBoliNica t1_itzcce3 wrote

So what makes you think these creators will fail, and need to already “earn trust back”? Why? Because of who they are?

That’s kinda problematic bud

0

VampireHunterAlex t1_itzebyx wrote

>deadline.com/2022/1...

Friend, there is an unbelievable amount of content out there: From networks, streaming services, YouTube, podcasts, books, music, etc. This crappy random network series is not a hill you need to die on.

And as for "problematic"? Inflation, disease, poverty, censorship, rising fascism: Those are examples of problems. Arguing with someone on the internet for their opinion on a television series is the definition of privileged, as I fully acknowledge from my end.

1