I've watched the first two episodes, and it's...okay? It seems to be in that weird spot where it's both not funny enough and not serious enough to warrant 40+ minutes. The writing and acting are fine, but the plot is just not very engaging so far. After the pilot's opening, I was expecting the series to be focused on him going through a full blown crisis/meltdown, but then not much happens. I chuckled when he immediately got his chair position back, but that also seemed to stop any plot momentum. And if he really didn't want to be chair anymore, then just step down? No one is forcing him to remain in that position.

I haven't read the book this is based on, so I have no idea if it's sticking to the plot, but right now the show is just kind of...there. I'll probably stick through episode three to see if it gets any better, but it's not doing a whole lot for me at the moment. Anyone else feel this way?

Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

MrDudeWheresMyCar t1_jdvj57y wrote on March 27, 2023 at 2:44 PM

#2,392,370

I haven't watched the second episode yet, but I definitely thought the plot was fairly limited in the pilot. Odenkirk's string of great performance has given this show a bit of a longer leash in my eyes though. I'd expect I'll give the whole season a chance and get off there if there isn't much happening.

ansky201 t1_jdvnesc wrote on March 27, 2023 at 3:13 PM

#2,393,004

I agree, it's terrible. I was looking forward to this show for months, but after watching the first 2 episodes I'm done. It's not even clear what the point of it is, and it's not funny or engaging in any way.

ArgyleTheChauffeur t1_jdvo3gb wrote on March 27, 2023 at 3:17 PM

#2,393,080

The trailer was bad, won't even watch the show.

aboycandream t1_jdvo5pf wrote on March 27, 2023 at 3:17 PM

#2,393,090

it is not good, its the kind of show that HBO would make in like 2007 and cancel mid season

Prax150 t1_jdvpotz wrote on March 27, 2023 at 3:28 PM

#2,393,312

Haven't watched the second yet but I liked the first one a lot. College campuses are an underused setting for shows/movies these days, it seems, and there's something that really engages me about how low the stakes are but how heightened the drama around it seems to be. Odenkirk is great and the supporting cast is full of under-appreciated actors. I also laughed out loud several times in the premiere. Perhaps the expectations were way too high being so near the end of BCS but that didn't affect it for me, I really enjoyed the pilot, will probably watch the second one tonight.

NoNefariousness2144 t1_jdvq4vd wrote on March 27, 2023 at 3:31 PM

#2,393,375

I feel like the reason they are only marketing the show by hyping up Bob Odenkirk is very telling.

hashcancomics t1_jdvs4ij wrote on March 27, 2023 at 3:44 PM

#2,393,688

It is really good for the genre it is. Bob Odenkirk said he wanted to get away from Saul Goodman and roles with guns and play a drama/comedy in the vein of Alexander Payne. So if you don't like it by now, you ain't going to like it.

Punjabistan t1_jdvwvy2 wrote on March 27, 2023 at 4:15 PM

#2,394,338

I'll give it at least three episodes to see where the show is heading, if it is actually good, I'll continue watching it. I've only watched the first one and have yet to see the second episode.

Personally, it could've been more suitable if they cut the bulk of the scenes and reduce the runtime to half an hour. But that's just me.

idunnobutchieinstead t1_jdw2rpv wrote on March 27, 2023 at 4:52 PM

#2,395,143

I am really enjoying it, but I knew what I wanted from it and I feel like so far I’m getting it.

Wait till he threatens a goose.

man1c_overlord t1_jdw8pep wrote on March 27, 2023 at 5:30 PM

#2,396,007

Replying to NoNefariousness2144 (#2,393,375)

true. i generally don't watch this kind of stuff anyway. honestly, i haven't even watched a good sitcom or comedy show in forever. that genre just isn't made for me.

this seems like a comedy/drama aimed at older people (i mean people in their 40s or so), which is why it is paced as such. tbh i am only watching for bob odenkirk.

Ok-Requirement5626 t1_jdwa0rn wrote on March 27, 2023 at 5:38 PM

#2,396,161

Replying to man1c_overlord (#2,396,007)

Do NOT call me old (I am 45). Like. Come on. I have the same feeling as the TO.

Ok-Requirement5626 t1_jdwa4m0 wrote on March 27, 2023 at 5:39 PM

#2,396,177

Replying to ansky201 (#2,393,004)

I hate to agree with you, but I do. :(

Dramatic_Purple186 t1_jdwhvlw wrote on March 27, 2023 at 6:28 PM

#2,397,181

Replying to ansky201 (#2,393,004)

100% agree there's no point at all. They are only hopeful because its Bob Odenkirk, that is the reason why anyone has watched it. He's not even that good in it (not his fault but the scripting).

Dramatic_Purple186 t1_jdwo5yz wrote on March 27, 2023 at 7:08 PM

#2,398,045

Please all report back after watching 2nd episode.

BladesMan235 t1_jdwqi2z wrote on March 27, 2023 at 7:23 PM

#2,398,397

It’s like if the show Vice Principles wasn’t funny at all and had dull acting

vannucker t1_jdx7868 wrote on March 27, 2023 at 9:10 PM

#2,400,697

Replying to NoNefariousness2144 (#2,393,375)

It recorded on my DVR because I have Better Call Saul as a series record and they were presented at as Better Call Saul: Lucky Hank or something like that. Sneaky. Didn't watch it because it didn't sound up my alley, although I would consider watching if I hear some hype that it is really good. But alas, that has not come to pass as of yet.

[deleted] t1_jdxa543 wrote on March 27, 2023 at 9:29 PM

#2,401,117

Replying to MrDudeWheresMyCar (#2,392,370)

[removed]

shadowdra126 t1_jdxdx0c wrote on March 27, 2023 at 9:55 PM

#2,401,695

I’m liking it but I have an English degree and work in English education so I may be biased

MTsumi t1_jdxoge9 wrote on March 27, 2023 at 11:11 PM

#2,403,250

I feel like someone wondered what it would be like to show behind the scenes of C-SPAN book hour. “Today’s guest wrote a book on the ephemeral qualities of wallpaper.”

MrPotatoButt t1_jdxx6lm wrote on March 28, 2023 at 12:15 AM

#2,404,617

I've only seen the pilot at this point, but yeah.

I usually wait until I've finished the 4th episode before pulling the trigger on a show.

spraragen88 t1_jdykqc2 wrote on March 28, 2023 at 3:11 AM

#2,408,206

It's terrible. The dude who played Toby in the office is the show runner, which explains a lot. It's just the most mediocre dramadey I've seen in years. Poor Bob probably got sidelined in a bad contract and forced to do this.

He needs to do more movies. Nobody 2 has to happen.

Smiling_Maelstrom t1_jdytvvk wrote on March 28, 2023 at 4:36 AM

#2,409,639

Replying to spraragen88 (#2,408,206)

the toby dude oversaw some of the funniest episodes in the office

so i have no idea what ur talking abt

the6thReplicant t1_jdzklj7 wrote on March 28, 2023 at 10:34 AM

#2,412,839

It’s a show that is as good as its characters. So far, so good.

I’m a bit apprehensive about the (wife’s) school and the dump of side characters it will introduce into the show.

man1c_overlord t1_jdzunb4 wrote on March 28, 2023 at 12:20 PM

#2,414,382

Replying to Ok-Requirement5626 (#2,396,161)

what is TO?

and fair, i shouldn't have said old, middle age would have been more appropriate

ShEditor83 t1_jdzzlc1 wrote on March 28, 2023 at 1:03 PM

#2,415,192

I watched the pilot and I enjoyed it but I felt like it won’t be capable of remaining interesting. The second episode seems to confirm my theory, but of course it’s just my opinion. I love Bob Odenkirk and Mireille Enos but maybe it won’t be enough for me to keep watching.

sweetpeapickle t1_je1aipv wrote on March 28, 2023 at 6:13 PM

#2,423,456

Replying to man1c_overlord (#2,396,007)

Lol, older people are in their 40's....what are you 10?

Exploding_dude t1_je3k6sq wrote on March 29, 2023 at 3:47 AM

#2,438,467

Replying to sweetpeapickle (#2,423,456)

40 is older compared to the average reddit demo. I'm in my 30s, we had a 19 year old girl at my last job and she called my partner and I older. It hit like a gut punch but then I remembered being 19 and thinking 30 seemed a lifetime away, which is basically is for a 19 year old.

man1c_overlord t1_je5yjqt wrote on March 29, 2023 at 5:26 PM

#2,454,142

Replying to sweetpeapickle (#2,423,456)

you seem a little insecure.

the quicker you embrace it, the better.

sweetpeapickle t1_je66vwh wrote on March 29, 2023 at 6:19 PM

#2,455,844

Replying to man1c_overlord (#2,454,142)

You do understand I'm joking??? Older means different decades for different "aged" people. The way you put it: aimed at older people, I mean 40's....sounds funny & typical coming from someone much younger. You know when you watch a tv show, and a character asks can you describe him/her-and a young person will say-old, you know like you or like my mom, etc.

BaconAlmighty t1_je6bsjh wrote on March 29, 2023 at 6:50 PM

#2,456,826

Replying to BladesMan235 (#2,398,397)

This is the synopsis of the show. Thank you, couldn't put my finger on it exactly but this is it.

TheGunde t1_je8zlj8 wrote on March 30, 2023 at 8:12 AM

#2,477,274

Yeah, I'm gonna rewatch Vice Principals instead

man1c_overlord t1_jeafeja wrote on March 30, 2023 at 4:16 PM

#2,489,727

Replying to sweetpeapickle (#2,455,844)

ok sir

[deleted] t1_jeap21u wrote on March 30, 2023 at 5:17 PM

#2,492,104

Replying to man1c_overlord (#2,396,007)

[deleted]

PerkaDirk t1_jeer36g wrote on March 31, 2023 at 2:11 PM

#2,530,338

It's pretty fucking bad [so far] definitely not living up to any hype I'm seeing... I watched the first episode two times thinking maybe I missed something just bored out of my skull. Figured I'd give the second episode a shot. Maybe it needs to find it's pacing and whatnot. Second episode was a little better but a very fucking slow ride. Not really that entertaining overall and it's comedy is weak at best. I would absolutely never recommend this to anyone from what I've seen so far. Overhyped boring drivel. I did not find myself laughing at all. The moments where it was supposed to be the funny part seemed forced or fell flat. To top it off just recently watched Bob odenkirk on hot ones. He was brave enough to say that Lucky Hank is both equal parts, comedy and drama. Very bold statement.