Submitted by HRJafael t3_1253ja3 in television
foxscribbles t1_je3ftm5 wrote
Reply to comment by [deleted] in ‘Britannia’ canceled by Sky after Season 3 cliffhanger finale by HRJafael
The decent thing for show runners to do is not make a cliffhanger if their show is on the cancellation bubble. (I think the only show I’ve watched that actually did this was the first run of Leverage.)
And if a show has enough of a following to get two full seasons or more, studios should have the decency to give them one double length episode to wrap up the loose ends. (So an hour episode for a sitcom, two hour episode for a drama.) But this will never happen.
Hanifsefu t1_je3qq31 wrote
It's honestly part of the problem with the shows in the first place. Cliffhangers are writing tactic that help to retain viewership between episodes and between seasons. The network usually demands them but they'll just hurt the show in the long run as each episode and season doesn't have enough payoff and the show winds up feeling horribly paced and unfulfilling.
Sometimes a show just doesn't have enough content to offer and being forced into the pacing of the weekly cliffhanger schedule kills them and any chance the story had at being fulfilling.
[deleted] t1_je3j65v wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments