>The repeated emphasis on “I,” instead of “we,” embodies a defining characteristic of current startup culture, one that has plagued the tech sector. These companies, the world has been told, aren’t simply run by chief executives or entrepreneurs – they are managed by founders. And founders are very special people who should not be questioned.
>
>Last year, Michele Romanow, Clearco’s co-founder, filmed promotional videos dubbed “Founder Diaries.” In one she declares that it is her life’s work to protect her breed. “If I can do anything in this world,” she says, “it is to help and defend founders, because they ultimately build the world we want to believe in.”
>
>Entrepreneurs, of course, deserve some praise. It is scary to venture out on your own, especially when the statistics show the vast majority of startups fail. Economic growth is also becoming more dependent on fresh ideas. In Canada, the oil and gas sector has been a major engine of gross domestic product for decades, but the world is moving away from fossil fuels.
>
>Yet the fawning over founders has become obscene. Even though cult-like admiration has deep roots in the tech sector, worship was once reserved for true visionaries such as Steve Jobs and Bill Gates. Somehow it was co-opted by oodles of entrepreneurs over the past five years – and turned truly perverse during the pandemic. Even Sequoia Capital, one of Silicon Valley’s leading venture capital firms, was seduced by FTX co-founder Sam Bankman-Fried.
>
>The excessive praise is particularly glaring now that so many companies are coming to grips with reality in a world of normal interest rates. Ms. Romanow stepped down as CEO of Clearco earlier this month after the company announced its second round of deep job cuts in six months. The new CEO, a U.S. finance-industry veteran, will try to turn Clearco around.
>
>Every business cycle has its alleged geniuses. The 1980s were dominated by junk bond specialists, the nineties by investment bankers, the aughts by hedge fund mangers. Eventually, they lose some, or all, of their glory. Many of the megamergers concocted by investment bankers blew up, and many hedge fund managers struggled to outperform the broader market for more than a few years. Founders, who personified the past decade, are facing their own comeuppance now.
>
>With some luck, a prolonged rout will humble them. And in the aftermath, a much healthier ecosystem may emerge, because entrepreneurs will refocus on building quality companies.
>
>...
>
>Because startups, and particularly software startups, became so sexy, it was hard to tell what was truly motivating founders any more – the experience or the money.
>
>Does it mean we’ve been building some bad businesses? “I would argue there’s some real truth to that,” Mr. Bartha said. After selling eCompliance in 2019, he launched GoodCapital, which backs founders who try to solve what he describes as “real world problems.”
>
>This theme – using the entrepreneurial spirit to make life better – is having a bit of a renaissance. It’s still early days, but even Mr. Suster is hopeful. For years he has ranted about how the goal of attaining unicorn status – a billion-dollar valuation on paper – destroyed so much of the good that startups can do. “Instead of growing revenue and holding down costs and building great company cultures, the market chased valuation validation,” he reiterated in a post last month.
>
>Lately, though, he believes we’re getting back to building “real businesses.”

It will be interesting to see what directions business, and in particular startup culture will take going forwards.

[deleted]

I really like that Ek was used in an example photo. Few people know how vile he is.

Plus regulations that protect consumers, allow items to be fixed, ensure support for products for 10 years, and demand that universal standards (like USB-C) exist. I'm tired of waiting for European regulations to be watered down for America.

Yes, anything to keep raising companies costs and consumers prices.

Or consumers could try being smart and stop buying from companies with horrible practices and, through the market, demand companies do better.

Nope, sorry, nevermind. Forgot who I was talking about. Government babysitting for everyone!

Working for Shopify, it was weird the amount of propaganda around the CEO.

Market pressure from consumers require that an overwhelming majority of consumers investigate what they are buying to an unreasonable level.

And companies with a lot of money will just pay to spread information or misinformation, making it even more difficult to make decisions as an informed consumer, even if you want to. Not just talking about commercials or PR statements, this goes all the way to paying research institutions sponsor money for specific projects.

Companies that don't fulfill a certain market certification can just create their own certification and market it to consumers. Showing off a shiny sticker that they are fulfilling what the market wants, while the company hasn't changed it's practices. Not to mention the constant problem with "oh no, our subcontractor didn't do their due diligence so our sub sub sub contractor that used child slave labor has now been cut off".

Government is at least elected.

Company oligarchies are inherited or conquered through financial power and exploitation.

You should try working at UPS. There is very much a cult of the founder even in established companies.

Company's leaders and products are even more effectively elected through the money we spend.

Thats not an election, people with more money have more votes, the people with less money who have to work to generate the wealth of the rich have no votes.

So...the rich buy a million Spotify subscriptions just to keep a terrible founder in power?

The rich have a paid option for Google searches?

The rich own 20 Teslas?

I've worked at the same top 500 company for many years, 3 different ceos. The first was worshipped and the next two spent their time fixing the culture. Leader worship ruins culture so fast.

Its amazing . The current crop of advantaged. spoiled, propped up by marketing , "entrepreneurial leaders" have ruined it for at least one generation of their peers by being so inept and obtuse that they completely destroyed the paper thin veil of intellectual superiority they cloak themselves with to maintain the façade of a fair playing field. It will be interesting to see what new concepts are used to conceal blatant oligarchy and nepotism for the short term.

What part of that money goes to the workers who actually built Spotify?

What part of what money?

Founder: "Not all of your ideas will be successes"

Everyone else: "So why does everyone including you think all of your management and business ideas are? Because you had one good idea and got lucky with the time and funding?"