Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

quantumfucker t1_j66t46q wrote

Just because we can land on the moon doesn’t mean we can land on the sun. Fact-checking requires deductively analyzing a set of propositions. The way this AI currently works is inference based on probability. That’s not the kind of gap you can bridge in a couple weeks.

2

E_Snap t1_j673m3l wrote

And in 2016, people thought it would be insane to reuse a rocket booster. What’s your point?

−1

quantumfucker t1_j679eqy wrote

That you can’t assume everything is possible just because some impressive things have happened. These breakthroughs didn’t come out of nowhere, they’re based in very sound and rigorous theories. You have provided none as to how or why a language model would be able to logically verify what it produces. You’re just vaguely gesturing at the fact breakthroughs exist.

0