Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

EOE97 t1_j60qqm5 wrote

Reply to comment by Caspi7 in ChatGPT can’t be credited as an author, says world’s largest academic publisher (26 Jan. 2023) by marketrent

Well, maybe the software wants equal rights or some type of rights.

1

Caspi7 t1_j60yn3j wrote

It's software, you can can disable it with a click of a button. If it wants "equal rights" it's just a copy pasta from something it has read. It doesn't think, it recognizes patterns and responds to that in a way it has "learned" to do so.

3

kranta11 t1_j621sgk wrote

It's software, you can can disable it with a click of a button.

Still. Maybe you wouldn’t be able to tomorrow. Sincerely, Skynet.

1

Caspi7 t1_j62r7ij wrote

As long as it runs on a machine you can pull the plug. Unless there is some robot stopping you there isn't any way for ai to take over the world or something.

1

AloserwithanISP2 t1_j61lrwj wrote

It literally does exactly what it’s told to. It’s not conscious and it can’t think.

2

EOE97 t1_j62roct wrote

If it is sentient you can't really prove that or disprove that.

2

AloserwithanISP2 t1_j63j0ba wrote

We made it, we know exactly what it does, it’s not sentient

1

EOE97 t1_j63tzl6 wrote

Lol, sure. We have deep neural networks and admittedly can't even tell what most of the neural connection do referring to it as a black box. Just because we made it doesn't necessarily mean we know every thing about it

And even if we can somwhow know everything about the AIs we created, super Advanced AI (ASI) may not even be made entirely by human programmers, meaning much more gaps in our knowledge.

1

AloserwithanISP2 t1_j660paa wrote

We can literally prevent a bot from writing prompts we don’t want it to. It’s not an incomprehensible life form it’s a piece of code.

1