marketrent OP t1_j5yl9jl wrote on January 26, 2023 at 1:47 PM

Reply to comment by mrstubali in ChatGPT can’t be credited as an author, says world’s largest academic publisher (26 Jan. 2023) by marketrent

>mrstubali

>More predictable behavior from goons who haven't been paid off yet.

>Ladies and gentlemen, the message of education and publisher racket: "Hey, don't reference where you actually got your information from." Dude we're in for a wild ride in the next 5-10 years.

In my excerpt comment, quoted from the linked content:

>Arguments against giving AI authorship is that software simply can’t fulfill the required duties, as Skipper and Nature Springer explain.

>“When we think of authorship of scientific papers, of research papers, we don’t just think about writing them,” says Skipper.

>“There are responsibilities that extend beyond publication, and certainly at the moment these AI tools are not capable of assuming those responsibilities.”

>Software cannot be meaningfully accountable for a publication, it cannot claim intellectual property rights for its work, and cannot correspond with other scientists and with the press to explain and answer questions on its work.