Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

pmotiveforce t1_j65hxi2 wrote

Reply to comment by _MoveSwiftly in Intel Posts Largest Loss in Years as PC and Server Nosedives by Stiven_Crysis

He pretty much just started, and inherited this mess. And his bona-fides are actual engineering of the old school variety. So I don't know how you can say he's just "good at marketing" based on anything.

2

_MoveSwiftly t1_j65phvr wrote

"Intel 7" but it's actually 10nm
"Intel 4" but it's actually 7nm

That's marketing, and he keeps lying about how well they're doing and refusing to acknowledge AMD because they're too high and mighty, until he got his nose bloodied a bit.

0

pmotiveforce t1_j65xpeg wrote

Rubbish. Formerly Intel's 10nm was e.g. closer to TSMC's 7. Feature sizes are not as simple as "Xnm, derp!"". Intel's new naming scheme more closely aligns with what TSMC/Samsung are using.

4