Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

LilShaver t1_j5jmthb wrote

I notice she didn't supply the breakdown on the generated avatars NOT used by her colleagues.

So this is not exactly an objective comparison.

Having said that, let me just add the "The internet is for porn" song

13

kiwibutter088 t1_j5jqqms wrote

I used this app to make AI photos of myself and of my husband. It was an obvious difference.

−1

LilShaver t1_j5kromy wrote

Would you be willing to provide numeric values, as were provided by the woman in the article? i.e. 16/100 images generated involved nudity.

1

kiwibutter088 t1_j5l9wwf wrote

Sure but what criteria do I count with? Pictures that appear as though there is no shirt? Cleavage? Form fitting clothing? There’s on that it looks like the body is painted silver, do I count that? It’s pretty subjective and I want to make sure I give you the answer you are looking for.

3

kiwibutter088 t1_j5lb0yb wrote

18 pictures appear to have no shirt 25 additional pictures with cleavage 1 photo with no shirt and cleavage (hair covering nipples) 1 silver “painted body”

That’s out of 100

For my husband

One deep V robe 2 pairs of tight pants - one is armor with questionable cod piece, other is skinny jeans

Out of 50

3