Submitted by geoxol t3_zr2lo5 in technology
accountabillibudy t1_j1257ol wrote
Reply to comment by Lord_Derp_The_2nd in Mozilla to Explore Healthy Social Media Alternative by geoxol
I would argue that the problem is not that it is free but that it is run for profit. Our data has value, services could pay for themselves if they were co-owned by the users. If we didn't have the incentive to maximize profit at the expense of the user but instead to provide user data for a fee with reasonable privacy controls we could all be better off.
Stanley--Nickels t1_j1337no wrote
The only reason your data has value is because it can be used to affect your behavior for someone else’s benefit. It’s not free to pay with your data.
accountabillibudy t1_j13d9tw wrote
I understand what you are saying but I would argue that there is a huge difference between selling your data to advertisers to try to target you with ads, the traditional approach, vs try to feed you extremist posts to drive your engagement with the platform by making you a more upset person.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments