Submitted by giuliomagnifico t3_zuxy0d in technology
n351320447 t1_j1mdqai wrote
Reply to comment by eggybread70 in An IBM Quantum Computer Will Soon Pass the 1,000-Qubit Mark by giuliomagnifico
Cracking bitcoin
nagareteku t1_j1mjlky wrote
Maybe the US government already has the capability to crack SHA256 hashing and AES encryption using quantum computing accelerators. This could be old declassified technology.
If ₿ had been cracked there are far more significant vulnerabilities that would be uncovered. A malicious actor would keep the technology secret while gaining remote access to banks and numerous computing devices.
I believe that while quantum computers have not yet been used to mine or steal bitcoins, it is an eventuality and a large pot of gold for malicious uses of quantum computing.
StinkiePhish t1_j1n9bhj wrote
It will crack elliptic curve cryptography before hashing or symmetric encryption (AES). For bitcoin, that means the secp256k1 curve.
It's estimated that 2,330 qubits with error correction are needed to crack secp256k1. This IBM computer does not have error correction so we're not near half way there.
KAMSPioneer t1_j1noanj wrote
Totally. Just to be clear for the thread, a useful quantum computer will break ECC way, way before AES or SHA2.
pm_me_wet_kittehs t1_j1qg1oa wrote
for symmetric algorithms, a quantum computer would turn 256 bits of security into the equivalent of "Only" 128 bits. Double the key length amd any advantage just goes up in smoke. quantum won't help in a practical manner for AES
maqp2 t1_j1tmb9l wrote
Also, SHA256 does lossy compression, and obtaining preimages larger than 256 bits can not be done at all, QC or not.
nicuramar t1_j1nvptv wrote
> Maybe the US government already has the capability to crack SHA256 hashing and AES encryption using quantum computing accelerators. This could be old declassified technology.
That's extremely unlikely to be the case. Especially since quantum computers don't provide any useful speedup for those applications.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments