Submitted by redhatGizmo t3_z6j69l in technology
Rezhio t1_iy1vsb1 wrote
Reply to comment by MechaSheeva in How a CoinDesk scoop led to the fall of Sam Bankman-Fried and implosion of FTX by redhatGizmo
Most crypto are not even good for sketchy shit since all wallets can be traced.
iruleatlifekthx t1_iy2a1c7 wrote
It depends? There are cryptocurrencies available that are stricter on privacy that people are able to skirt the law with. Certainly not unheard of. But most of is true, and that's crypto was originally meant to be a currency that couldn't be controlled or manipulated by any one government entity, free to be used by the world over. It was not meant to skirt the law.
taradiddletrope t1_iy2vk8f wrote
“Stricter on privacy” is not the same as untraceable.
Tons of mf’s in jail right now that committed crimes before DNA was used in crime investigations who got caught with DNA evidence.
[deleted] t1_iy1x3sv wrote
[removed]
JViz t1_iy2hwie wrote
Use a coin built on privacy. Monero, Decred, Zcash, and Grin were all built to be private.
So.... people think I'm wrong? Why/how?
DevAway22314 t1_iy45ba3 wrote
It sounds like you're shilling coins more than giving legitimate suggestion. I've spent a decent amount of time on darknet market places and never heard of decred or grin. Zcash I think I've seen like once, maybe?
The biggest oddity is that you didn't suggest Monero, which has been the #1 privacy coin for the entire history of privacy coins. It's also the only one you could regularly use to buy "sketchy shit"
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments